Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 19;20(20):5182. doi: 10.3390/ijms20205182

Table 1.

Body weight and composition variations according to obesity-treated groups.

ND-EX Control HFD-ND HFD-ND EX HFD-ND GW HFD-ND EX GW
Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD
ΔBW (T1−T0) (g) 1.68 1.19 −2.33 1.08 −2.28 1.42 −6.2 # 2.86 −4.4 # 1.98
Adipose tissues (mg/g) Subcutaneous 17.29 3.73 21.98 $ 6.74 14.61 * 2.43 14.33 * 2.86 14.67 * 4.21
Visceral 12.55 3.36 21.12 $ 7.16 11.41 * 3.33 11.77 * 1.10 10.93 * 3.08
Brown 3.50 1.17 3.54 0.63 2.98 0.27 3.32 0.42 2.85 0.44
Skeletal muscles (mg/g) TLA 1.87 0.74 1.45 0.18 1.65 0.08 1.59 0.06 1.56 0.11
Vastus lateralis 6.88 0.48 6.40 0.37 7.03 0.24 6.83 0.64 7.27 * 0.41
Soleus 0.28 0.02 0.26 0.02 0.33 0.05 0.33 0.15 0.27 0.05

Mice were fed a Normal chow Diet (ND) (n = 6) or High Fat Diet (HFD) (n = 24) for 12 weeks. At T0, they all received a ND for 8 weeks. HFD mice were then randomly assigned in one of four groups: only return to ND (HFD-ND, n = 6), return to ND plus exercise training (HFD-ND-EX, n = 6), return to ND plus PPARβ/δ agonist GW0742 treatment (HFD-ND-GW, n = 6), or return to ND plus combined treatment (HFD-ND-EX-GW, n = 6). ND fed mice were maintained on a ND and were trained to be considered as a “healthy” reference group (ND-EX, n = 6). Data are expressed as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05 vs. HFD-ND and # p < 0.05 GW0742 effect (2-way ANOVA); $ p < 0.05 vs. ND-EX (one-way ANOVA).