Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
. 2019 Oct 3;75(Pt 11):1590–1594. doi: 10.1107/S2056989019013379

Synthesis, crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis of 4-[3-(4-hy­droxy­phen­yl)-4,5-di­hydro-1H-pyrazol-5-yl]-2-meth­oxy­phenol monohydrate

Linh Duong Khanh a,*, My Hanh Trinh Thi a, Thuy Quynh Bui Thi a, Trung Vu Quoc a, Vuong Nguyen Thien b,c, Luc Van Meervelt d,*
PMCID: PMC6829711  PMID: 31709074

In the title pyrazoline derivative, the pyrazoline ring makes angles of 86.73 (12) and 13.44 (12)° with the tris­ubstituted and disubstituted benzene rings, respectively. In the crystal structure, the mol­ecules are connected into chains running in the b-axis direction by O—H⋯N hydrogen bonding. Parallel chains inter­act through N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds and π–π stacking of the tris­ubstituted phenyl rings.

Keywords: crystal structure, pyrazolines, hydrogen bonding, Hirshfeld analysis

Abstract

In the title pyrazoline derivative, C16H16N2O3·H2O, the pyrazoline ring has an envelope conformation with the substituted sp 2 C atom on the flap. The pyrazoline ring makes angles of 86.73 (12) and 13.44 (12)° with the tris­ubstituted and disubstituted benzene rings, respectively. In the crystal structure, the mol­ecules are connected into chains running in the b-axis direction by O—H⋯N hydrogen bonding. Parallel chains inter­act through N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds and π–π stacking of the tris­ubstituted phenyl rings. The major contribution to the surface contacts are H⋯H contacts (44.3%) as concluded from a Hirshfeld surface analysis.

Chemical context  

Chalcones are one of the most important classes of flavonoids. Natural and synthetic chalcone derivatives have shown a variety of promising biological activities such as anti-inflammatory, anti-gout, anti-histaminic, anti-oxidant, anti-obesity, anti-protozoal, hypnotic and anti-spasmodic activities (Gomes et al., 2017). Heterocyclic compounds including pyrazolines can be synthesized from chalcone derivatives. Many compounds containing pyrazolines show different biological activities and are known to act as anti­cancer (Johnson et al., 2007; Gomha et al., 2017), anti­microbial (Patel et al., 2016), anti­tubercular (Taj et al., 2011), anti-inflammatory (Malhotra et al., 2010), anti­convulsant (Siddiqui et al., 2009), anti-amoebic (Bhat et al., 2009), anti­oxidant (Srinivasan et al., 2007), anti­viral (Gomha et al., 2016), anti­bacterial (Kumar et al., 2008) and anti­nociceptive (Kaplancikli et al., 2009) agents.

Pyrazoline derivatives have been synthesized by condensation of chalcones with hydrazine derivatives using conventional synthesis (Shahare et al., 2009; Sridhar et al., 2012) and microwave-assisted synthesis (Kumar et al., 2008; Patel et al., 2016).

In this article, we report the synthesis of a chalcone derivative by condensation of vanillin with p-hy­droxy­aceto­phenone and subsequent cyclization of this chalcone by reaction with hydrazine hydrate. Furthermore the mol­ecular and crystal structure of the title compound, 2, are presented together with a Hirshfeld surface analysis and non-covalent inter­action plots.graphic file with name e-75-01590-scheme1.jpg

Structural commentary  

The title compound crystallizes in the ortho­rhom­bic space group Pbca with one mol­ecule and a water mol­ecule in the asymmetric unit (Fig. 1). The pyrazoline ring (N1/N2/C3–C5; r.m.s. deviation = 0.078 Å) is slightly twisted on N2—C3 [puckering parameters: Q(2) = 0.175 (2) Å, Φ(2) = 60.7 (7)°]. There is a clear difference in both C—N bond distances in the pyrazoline ring: N1=C5 shows double-bond character [1.287 (3) Å] while N2—C3 [1.496 (3) Å] is a single bond. The dihedral angle between the two benzene rings is 80.66 (11)°. The planes of the C6–C11 benzene ring (r.m.s. deviation = 0.004 Å) and the pyrazoline ring make an angle of 86.73 (12)°. For the C15–C20 benzene ring (r.m.s. deviation = 0.006 Å), the dihedral angle with the pyrazoline ring is only 13.44 (12)°. Both the hy­droxy and meth­oxy substituents of the C6–C11 phenyl group are within the phenyl plane with deviations of 0.011 (1) (O12), 0.166 (2) (C13) and −0.057 (2) Å (O14).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

A view of the mol­ecular structure of 2, with atom labels and displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level. H atoms are shown as small circles of arbitrary radii and the O—H⋯N inter­action as a dotted blue line.

Supra­molecular features and Hirshfeld surface analysis  

In the crystal of 2, the O22 water mol­ecule bridges three mol­ecules by O—H⋯N and O—H⋯O hydrogen-bonding inter­actions with the N1 atom and the O21-hy­droxy group (Fig. 2, Table 1). The pyrazoline N2 atom acts as a hydrogen-bond acceptor to the second O14-hy­droxy group, resulting in chain formation along the b-axis direction (Fig. 3, Table 1). Parallel chains linked by inversion inter­act in two different ways. First, the N2 hydrogen atom acts also as hydrogen-bond donor to the O12-meth­oxy group. In addition, both chains inter­act by π–π stacking [Cg1⋯Cg1(−x + 1, −y + 1, −z + 1) = 3.6627 (11) Å; slippage 1.442 Å; Cg1 is the centroid of the C6–C11 ring]. In addition, a C—H⋯O inter­action is observed in the crystal packing (Table 1). No voids are observed in the crystal packing of 2.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Partial crystal packing of 2, showing the inter­actions of water mol­ecule O22. O—H⋯N and O—H⋯O inter­actions are shown as blue and red dashed lines, respectively (see Table 1 for symmetry codes).

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N2—H2⋯O12i 0.87 (2) 2.36 (2) 3.209 (2) 167 (2)
O14—H14⋯N2ii 0.91 (3) 1.89 (3) 2.760 (2) 158 (3)
O21—H21⋯O22iii 0.98 (4) 1.66 (4) 2.633 (3) 169 (4)
O22—H22A⋯O21iv 0.91 (4) 1.99 (4) 2.891 (3) 171 (3)
O22—H22B⋯N1 0.98 (4) 1.84 (4) 2.794 (3) 166 (3)
C7—H7⋯O12v 0.93 2.56 3.465 (2) 165

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic; (iii) Inline graphic; (iv) Inline graphic; (v) Inline graphic.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Partial crystal packing of 2, showing the chain formation along the b axis by O—H⋯N inter­actions (blue dashed lines). Parallel chains are linked by N—H⋯O (red dashed lines) and π–π inter­actions (grey dashed lines; Cg1 is the centroid of the C6–C11 ring; see Table 1 for symmetry codes).

The Hirshfeld surface (calculated using CrystalExplorer; Turner et al., 2017) mapped over d norm in Fig. 4 also gives the usual indications of these inter­molecular inter­actions through the appearance of bright-red spots near participating atoms (Spackman & Jayatilaka, 2009). In addition to the inter­actions already discussed, faint-red spots near atoms C8, C11, H3 and H4A illustrate short C⋯H contacts (H4A⋯C11 = 2.83 Å, H3⋯C8 = 2.80 Å). The associated two-dimensional fingerprint plots (McKinnon et al., 2007) were used to further explore the inter­molecular contacts (Fig. 5) and indicate that the major contribution is from H⋯H contacts, corresponding to 44.3% of the fingerprint plot (Fig. 5 b) followed by recip­rocal C⋯H/H⋯C contacts (25.1%, Fig. 5 c). Significant contributions come from reciprocal O⋯H/H⋯O (20.7%) and N⋯H/H⋯N (7.0%) contacts, which appear as two symmetrical spikes at d e + d i = 1.65 and 1.80 Å, respectively (Fig. 5 d,e). A further small contribution is from C⋯C contacts (2.3%, Fig. 5 f).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Two views of the Hirshfeld surface mapped over d norm for 2 in the range −0.7348 to +1.5269 arbitrary units.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Full two-dimensional fingerprint plots for 2, showing (a) all inter­actions, and delineated into (b) H⋯H, (c) C⋯H/H⋯C, (d) O⋯H/H⋯O, (e) N⋯H/H⋯N and (f) C⋯C inter­actions. The d i and d e values are the closest inter­nal and external distances (in Å) from a given point on the Hirshfeld surface.

Based on the Hirshfeld surface analysis, enrichment ratios (ER, Table 2) were calculated by comparing the contacts in the crystal with those computed as if all types of contact have the same probability of forming (Jelsch et al., 2014). A ratio greater than unity for a pair of elements indicates a high likelihood of forming contacts in the crystal. This is the case for N⋯H and O⋯H contacts, which is consistent with the high propensity for the formation of O—H⋯N and O/N/C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. C⋯H contacts are enriched because of the presence of aromatic rings, H⋯H contacts are found to have the usual enrichment ratios slightly lower than unity.

Table 2. Enrichment ratios for 2 .

Parameter Ratio
H⋯H 0.89
C⋯H 1.18
O⋯H 1.39
N⋯H 1.41
C⋯C 1.02

Database survey  

A search of the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, Version 5.40, update of May 2019; Groom et al., 2016) for 2-pyrazoline derivatives gave 134 hits, of which 37 are 3,5-disubstituted (only organic mol­ecules were considered). Where both substituents on the pyrazoline ring are aromatic rings, three 2-pyrazoline derivatives were found with substituted benzene rings at position 3 and a 2-naphthyl ring system at position 5. In addition, two structures have substituted benzene rings as both substituents and are very similar to 2. The first one, 2-meth­oxy-4-[3-(3-nitro­phen­yl)-4,5-di­hydro-1H-pyrazol-5-yl]phenol (refcode UJUDOU; Inturi et al., 2016), crystallizes in P21/c with one mol­ecule in the asymmetric unit. The pyrazoline ring has an envelope conformation with the substituted sp 2 C atom on the flap. The dihedral angle between the phenyl rings is 49.37 (8)°, that between the pyrazoline ring and the nitro­phenyl ring is 9.7 (1)° and that between the pyrazoline ring and the meth­oxy­phenol ring is 56. 78 (9)°. The second structure, 3-(2′-hy­droxy-5′-meth­oxy-phen­yl)-5-(3-meth­oxy-4-hy­droxy­phen­yl)-4,5-di­hydro-1H-pyrazole (RES­JUV; Gupta et al., 2006), crystallizes in Pbca with one mol­ecule in the asymmetric unit. The conformation of the pyrazoline ring is the same as that in UJUDOU. The phenyl rings make an angle of 56.0 (1)°, while the dihedral angles between the pyrazoline ring and the phenyl rings at atom C3 and C5 are 12.1 (1) and 68.2 (1)°, respectively.

Synthesis and crystallization  

The reaction scheme for the synthesis of 2 starting from vanillin is given in Fig. 6. (E)-3-(4-Hy­droxy-3-meth­oxy­phen­yl)-1-(4-hy­droxy­phen­yl)prop-2-en-1-one, 1, was synthesized as described in a previous study (Duong Khanh et al., 2018).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Reaction scheme for the synthesis of compound 2.

Synthesis of 4-(3-(4-hy­droxy­phen­yl)-4,5-di­hydro-1H-pyrazol-5-yl)-2-meth­oxy­phenol (2):

A mixture of chalcone 1 (0.01 mol), 2.5 mL of hydrazine hydrate and 25 mL of ethanol was refluxed at 353 K for 2 h. After pouring the reaction mixture into 200 mL of ice–water, the crude solid product was isolated by vacuum filtration, washed several times with cold water and recrystallized from ethanol:water (1:2) to give yellow crystals (2.24 g, yield 79%), m.p. 465 K. 1H NMR [Bruker XL-500, 500 MHz, d 6-DMSO, δ (ppm), J (Hz), see Fig. 6 for numbering scheme]: 6.71 (d, 1H, J = 8.0, H2); 3.75 (s, 3H, H2a); 6.74 (d, 1H, J = 1.5, H3); 6.95 (d, 1H, J = 1.5, H5), 4.67 (t, 1H, H7); 3.30 (dd, 1H, J = 11.0; 16.0, H8a); 2.76 (dd, 1H, J = 11.0, 16.0, H8b), 7.45 (d, 2H, J = 8.5, H11 and H15); 6.76 (d, 2H, J = 8.5, H12 and H14).

Refinement  

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 3. The O- and N-bound H atoms H2, H14, H21, H22A and H22B were found in difference electron density maps and refined freely. The other H atoms were placed in idealized positions and included as riding contributions with U iso(H) values of 1.2U eq or 1.5U eq of the parent atoms, with C—H distances of 0.93 (aromatic), 0.98 (CH), 0.97 (CH2) and 0.96 Å (CH3). In the final cycles of refinement, eight outliers were omitted.

Table 3. Experimental details.

Crystal data
Chemical formula C16H16N2O3·H2O
M r 302.32
Crystal system, space group Orthorhombic, P b c a
Temperature (K) 293
a, b, c (Å) 12.1452 (5), 8.1784 (3), 31.2738 (12)
V3) 3106.4 (2)
Z 8
Radiation type Mo Kα
μ (mm−1) 0.09
Crystal size (mm) 0.5 × 0.2 × 0.05
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Rigaku Oxford Diffraction SuperNova, Single source at offset/far, Eos
Absorption correction Multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Rigaku OD, 2018)
T min, T max 0.697, 1.000
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 16817, 3172, 2241
R int 0.039
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.625
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.050, 0.115, 1.03
No. of reflections 3172
No. of parameters 220
H-atom treatment H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.18, −0.19

Computer programs: CrysAlis PRO (Rigaku OD, 2018), SHELXT2014 (Sheldrick, 2015a ), SHELXL2016 (Sheldrick, 2015b ) and OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989019013379/sj5579sup1.cif

e-75-01590-sup1.cif (462.8KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989019013379/sj5579Isup2.hkl

e-75-01590-Isup2.hkl (174.3KB, hkl)

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989019013379/sj5579Isup3.cml

CCDC references: 1956698, 1956698

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Acknowledgments

LVM thanks the Hercules Foundation for supporting the purchase of the diffractometer through project AKUL/09/ 0035.

supplementary crystallographic information

Crystal data

C16H16N2O3·H2O Dx = 1.293 Mg m3
Mr = 302.32 Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Orthorhombic, Pbca Cell parameters from 4406 reflections
a = 12.1452 (5) Å θ = 3.1–24.8°
b = 8.1784 (3) Å µ = 0.09 mm1
c = 31.2738 (12) Å T = 293 K
V = 3106.4 (2) Å3 Plate, yellow
Z = 8 0.5 × 0.2 × 0.05 mm
F(000) = 1280

Data collection

Rigaku Oxford Diffraction SuperNova, Single source at offset/far, Eos diffractometer 3172 independent reflections
Radiation source: micro-focus sealed X-ray tube, SuperNova (Mo) X-ray Source 2241 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Mirror monochromator Rint = 0.039
Detector resolution: 15.9631 pixels mm-1 θmax = 26.4°, θmin = 2.6°
ω scans h = −15→15
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Rigaku OD, 2018) k = −10→9
Tmin = 0.697, Tmax = 1.000 l = −38→39
16817 measured reflections

Refinement

Refinement on F2 0 restraints
Least-squares matrix: full Hydrogen site location: mixed
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.050 H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.115 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0321P)2 + 1.8202P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.03 (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
3172 reflections Δρmax = 0.18 e Å3
220 parameters Δρmin = −0.19 e Å3

Special details

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
O12 0.67375 (11) 0.32986 (16) 0.53007 (4) 0.0374 (4)
O14 0.56063 (13) 0.13497 (17) 0.48138 (5) 0.0433 (4)
N2 0.51402 (15) 0.8855 (2) 0.42476 (5) 0.0347 (4)
N1 0.49999 (14) 0.9151 (2) 0.38046 (5) 0.0384 (4)
O22 0.29208 (18) 0.8202 (3) 0.35137 (6) 0.0677 (5)
O21 0.64259 (19) 1.0090 (3) 0.18438 (6) 0.0803 (7)
C8 0.63357 (15) 0.3973 (2) 0.49290 (6) 0.0287 (4)
C9 0.57465 (16) 0.2905 (2) 0.46661 (6) 0.0306 (4)
C7 0.64750 (15) 0.5586 (2) 0.48084 (6) 0.0298 (4)
H7 0.686502 0.629245 0.498546 0.036*
C6 0.60392 (16) 0.6168 (2) 0.44254 (6) 0.0312 (4)
C11 0.54679 (16) 0.5094 (2) 0.41631 (6) 0.0346 (5)
H11 0.517910 0.546425 0.390526 0.042*
C3 0.61976 (16) 0.7953 (2) 0.43154 (7) 0.0348 (5)
H3 0.660239 0.848056 0.454879 0.042*
C10 0.53234 (17) 0.3472 (2) 0.42823 (6) 0.0354 (5)
H10 0.494061 0.276326 0.410349 0.042*
C5 0.59163 (17) 0.8914 (2) 0.36073 (7) 0.0376 (5)
C15 0.60588 (19) 0.9252 (3) 0.31515 (7) 0.0431 (5)
C4 0.68056 (18) 0.8284 (3) 0.38953 (7) 0.0450 (6)
H4A 0.738080 0.909351 0.393418 0.054*
H4B 0.712858 0.728975 0.378196 0.054*
C13 0.7444 (2) 0.4300 (3) 0.55573 (7) 0.0482 (6)
H13A 0.803642 0.471013 0.538454 0.072*
H13B 0.773932 0.366112 0.578791 0.072*
H13C 0.703076 0.520021 0.567146 0.072*
C16 0.6949 (2) 0.8613 (3) 0.29308 (8) 0.0574 (7)
H16 0.746563 0.798987 0.307775 0.069*
C18 0.6333 (2) 0.9799 (3) 0.22753 (8) 0.0597 (7)
C20 0.5313 (2) 1.0207 (3) 0.29215 (8) 0.0615 (7)
H20 0.471444 1.067128 0.306189 0.074*
C17 0.7088 (2) 0.8877 (3) 0.24971 (8) 0.0654 (8)
H17 0.769099 0.843147 0.235584 0.079*
C19 0.5450 (2) 1.0475 (4) 0.24884 (8) 0.0723 (9)
H19 0.494359 1.111272 0.234017 0.087*
H2 0.4564 (18) 0.832 (3) 0.4332 (7) 0.042 (6)*
H22A 0.317 (3) 0.729 (5) 0.3380 (11) 0.109 (14)*
H22B 0.364 (3) 0.867 (4) 0.3581 (10) 0.106 (12)*
H14 0.533 (2) 0.072 (4) 0.4599 (9) 0.082 (10)*
H21 0.705 (3) 0.949 (5) 0.1719 (12) 0.130 (14)*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
O12 0.0429 (8) 0.0318 (7) 0.0375 (8) −0.0015 (6) −0.0074 (6) 0.0036 (6)
O14 0.0619 (10) 0.0250 (8) 0.0429 (9) −0.0082 (7) −0.0049 (8) 0.0019 (7)
N2 0.0417 (10) 0.0297 (9) 0.0329 (9) 0.0003 (8) −0.0026 (8) 0.0031 (8)
N1 0.0431 (10) 0.0380 (10) 0.0340 (9) 0.0041 (8) −0.0045 (8) 0.0021 (8)
O22 0.0638 (13) 0.0794 (14) 0.0599 (12) 0.0010 (11) −0.0157 (10) −0.0056 (11)
O21 0.0997 (17) 0.0965 (16) 0.0446 (11) 0.0282 (13) 0.0183 (11) 0.0222 (11)
C8 0.0293 (10) 0.0280 (10) 0.0289 (10) 0.0025 (8) 0.0020 (8) 0.0011 (8)
C9 0.0316 (10) 0.0238 (9) 0.0365 (11) 0.0002 (8) 0.0038 (9) 0.0004 (8)
C7 0.0300 (10) 0.0264 (10) 0.0331 (11) −0.0013 (8) −0.0015 (8) −0.0024 (8)
C6 0.0329 (10) 0.0271 (10) 0.0336 (11) −0.0006 (8) 0.0003 (8) 0.0001 (9)
C11 0.0368 (11) 0.0342 (11) 0.0329 (11) 0.0002 (9) −0.0044 (9) 0.0028 (9)
C3 0.0360 (11) 0.0297 (10) 0.0387 (12) −0.0042 (8) −0.0078 (9) 0.0049 (9)
C10 0.0400 (11) 0.0308 (11) 0.0353 (11) −0.0049 (9) −0.0016 (9) −0.0054 (9)
C5 0.0411 (12) 0.0316 (11) 0.0402 (12) −0.0015 (9) −0.0009 (10) 0.0040 (9)
C15 0.0464 (13) 0.0430 (12) 0.0400 (12) 0.0030 (10) 0.0018 (10) 0.0069 (10)
C4 0.0384 (12) 0.0435 (12) 0.0531 (14) −0.0057 (9) −0.0008 (10) 0.0162 (11)
C13 0.0535 (14) 0.0481 (13) 0.0430 (13) −0.0083 (11) −0.0160 (11) 0.0040 (11)
C16 0.0575 (16) 0.0672 (17) 0.0476 (14) 0.0172 (13) 0.0071 (12) 0.0136 (13)
C18 0.0713 (18) 0.0653 (17) 0.0426 (14) 0.0109 (14) 0.0114 (13) 0.0133 (13)
C20 0.0671 (17) 0.0702 (18) 0.0473 (14) 0.0255 (14) 0.0129 (13) 0.0154 (13)
C17 0.0643 (17) 0.0809 (19) 0.0511 (15) 0.0235 (15) 0.0170 (13) 0.0109 (15)
C19 0.079 (2) 0.089 (2) 0.0490 (15) 0.0365 (17) 0.0091 (14) 0.0240 (15)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

O12—C8 1.376 (2) C3—H3 0.9800
O12—C13 1.432 (2) C3—C4 1.531 (3)
O14—C9 1.364 (2) C10—H10 0.9300
O14—H14 0.91 (3) C5—C15 1.462 (3)
N2—N1 1.417 (2) C5—C4 1.498 (3)
N2—C3 1.496 (3) C15—C16 1.385 (3)
N2—H2 0.87 (2) C15—C20 1.396 (3)
N1—C5 1.287 (3) C4—H4A 0.9700
O22—H22A 0.91 (4) C4—H4B 0.9700
O22—H22B 0.98 (4) C13—H13A 0.9600
O21—C18 1.375 (3) C13—H13B 0.9600
O21—H21 0.98 (4) C13—H13C 0.9600
C8—C9 1.397 (3) C16—H16 0.9300
C8—C7 1.383 (3) C16—C17 1.384 (3)
C9—C10 1.386 (3) C18—C17 1.375 (3)
C7—H7 0.9300 C18—C19 1.379 (3)
C7—C6 1.393 (3) C20—H20 0.9300
C6—C11 1.387 (3) C20—C19 1.382 (3)
C6—C3 1.513 (3) C17—H17 0.9300
C11—H11 0.9300 C19—H19 0.9300
C11—C10 1.389 (3)
C8—O12—C13 117.18 (15) N1—C5—C4 112.78 (18)
C9—O14—H14 108.7 (18) C15—C5—C4 124.46 (19)
N1—N2—C3 109.04 (16) C16—C15—C5 120.5 (2)
N1—N2—H2 106.6 (14) C16—C15—C20 117.4 (2)
C3—N2—H2 113.6 (14) C20—C15—C5 122.1 (2)
C5—N1—N2 109.81 (17) C3—C4—H4A 111.1
H22A—O22—H22B 97 (3) C3—C4—H4B 111.1
C18—O21—H21 112 (2) C5—C4—C3 103.23 (17)
O12—C8—C9 115.37 (16) C5—C4—H4A 111.1
O12—C8—C7 124.70 (17) C5—C4—H4B 111.1
C7—C8—C9 119.93 (17) H4A—C4—H4B 109.1
O14—C9—C8 116.60 (17) O12—C13—H13A 109.5
O14—C9—C10 124.02 (18) O12—C13—H13B 109.5
C10—C9—C8 119.36 (17) O12—C13—H13C 109.5
C8—C7—H7 119.5 H13A—C13—H13B 109.5
C8—C7—C6 120.92 (18) H13A—C13—H13C 109.5
C6—C7—H7 119.5 H13B—C13—H13C 109.5
C7—C6—C3 118.49 (17) C15—C16—H16 119.2
C11—C6—C7 118.83 (17) C17—C16—C15 121.7 (2)
C11—C6—C3 122.68 (17) C17—C16—H16 119.2
C6—C11—H11 119.7 O21—C18—C17 122.4 (2)
C6—C11—C10 120.59 (18) O21—C18—C19 118.0 (2)
C10—C11—H11 119.7 C17—C18—C19 119.7 (2)
N2—C3—C6 113.52 (16) C15—C20—H20 119.5
N2—C3—H3 108.6 C19—C20—C15 121.0 (2)
N2—C3—C4 101.83 (15) C19—C20—H20 119.5
C6—C3—H3 108.6 C16—C17—H17 120.0
C6—C3—C4 115.28 (17) C18—C17—C16 119.9 (2)
C4—C3—H3 108.6 C18—C17—H17 120.0
C9—C10—C11 120.36 (18) C18—C19—C20 120.3 (2)
C9—C10—H10 119.8 C18—C19—H19 119.9
C11—C10—H10 119.8 C20—C19—H19 119.9
N1—C5—C15 122.76 (19)
O12—C8—C9—O14 2.2 (2) C7—C6—C3—N2 −121.91 (19)
O12—C8—C9—C10 −179.16 (17) C7—C6—C3—C4 121.2 (2)
O12—C8—C7—C6 180.00 (17) C6—C11—C10—C9 0.2 (3)
O14—C9—C10—C11 177.47 (18) C6—C3—C4—C5 108.50 (19)
N2—N1—C5—C15 −174.82 (18) C11—C6—C3—N2 57.3 (3)
N2—N1—C5—C4 4.4 (2) C11—C6—C3—C4 −59.6 (3)
N2—C3—C4—C5 −14.9 (2) C3—N2—N1—C5 −15.0 (2)
N1—N2—C3—C6 −106.21 (19) C3—C6—C11—C10 −178.59 (18)
N1—N2—C3—C4 18.3 (2) C5—C15—C16—C17 178.3 (2)
N1—C5—C15—C16 −163.9 (2) C5—C15—C20—C19 −178.3 (3)
N1—C5—C15—C20 15.7 (3) C15—C5—C4—C3 −173.42 (19)
N1—C5—C4—C3 7.3 (2) C15—C16—C17—C18 0.2 (4)
O21—C18—C17—C16 −179.5 (3) C15—C20—C19—C18 −0.1 (5)
O21—C18—C19—C20 179.4 (3) C4—C5—C15—C16 17.0 (3)
C8—C9—C10—C11 −1.1 (3) C4—C5—C15—C20 −163.5 (2)
C8—C7—C6—C11 −0.6 (3) C13—O12—C8—C9 173.54 (18)
C8—C7—C6—C3 178.69 (17) C13—O12—C8—C7 −6.8 (3)
C9—C8—C7—C6 −0.3 (3) C16—C15—C20—C19 1.2 (4)
C7—C8—C9—O14 −177.51 (17) C20—C15—C16—C17 −1.3 (4)
C7—C8—C9—C10 1.1 (3) C17—C18—C19—C20 −1.0 (5)
C7—C6—C11—C10 0.6 (3) C19—C18—C17—C16 0.9 (5)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
N2—H2···O12i 0.87 (2) 2.36 (2) 3.209 (2) 167 (2)
O14—H14···N2ii 0.91 (3) 1.89 (3) 2.760 (2) 158 (3)
O21—H21···O22iii 0.98 (4) 1.66 (4) 2.633 (3) 169 (4)
O22—H22A···O21iv 0.91 (4) 1.99 (4) 2.891 (3) 171 (3)
O22—H22B···N1 0.98 (4) 1.84 (4) 2.794 (3) 166 (3)
C7—H7···O12v 0.93 2.56 3.465 (2) 165

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1; (ii) x, y−1, z; (iii) x+1/2, y, −z+1/2; (iv) −x+1, y−1/2, −z+1/2; (v) −x+3/2, y+1/2, z.

References

  1. Bhat, A. R., Athar, F. & Azam, A. (2009). Eur. J. Med. Chem. 44, 426–431. [DOI] [PubMed]
  2. Dolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2009). J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 339–341.
  3. Duong Khanh, L., Do Ba, D., Do Truc, V., Nguyen Thuy, C. & Vu Quoc, T. (2018). Vietnam J. Chem. 56, 606–611.
  4. Gomes, M. N., Muratov, E. N., Pereira, M., Peixoto, J. C., Rosseto, L. P., Cravo, P. V. L., Andrade, C. H. & Neves, B. J. (2017). Molecules, 22, 1210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  5. Gomha, S. M., Abdallah, M., Abd El-Aziz, M. & Serag, N. (2016). Turk. J. Chem. 40, 484–498.
  6. Gomha, S. M., Abdallah, M. A., Al-Showiman, S. S., Morad, M. A. & Mabkhot, Y. N. (2017). Biomed. Res. 28, 9903–9909.
  7. Groom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  8. Gupta, V. K., Kalyan, M., Amina, M., Satti, N. K., Dutt, P. & Suri, K. A. (2006). Anal. Sci. X, 22, x261–x262.
  9. Inturi, B., Roopashree, K. R., Pujar, G. V., Mohammed, I. A. & Devarajegowda, H. C. (2016). IUCrData, 1, x160466.
  10. Jelsch, C., Ejsmont, K. & Huder, L. (2014). IUCrJ, 1, 119–128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  11. Johnson, M., Younglove, B., Lee, L., LeBlanc, R., Holt, H. Jr, Hills, P., Mackay, H., Brown, T., Mooberry, S. L. & Lee, M. (2007). Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 17, 5897–5901. [DOI] [PubMed]
  12. Kaplancikli, Z. A., Turan-Zitouni, G., Ozdemir, A., Can, O. D. & Chevallet, P. (2009). Eur. J. Med. Chem. 44, 2606–2610. [DOI] [PubMed]
  13. Kumar, R., Bajia, B. & Srivastava, Y. K. (2008). Biomed. Pharmacol. J. 1, 173–176.
  14. Malhotra, P., Pattan, S. & Nikalje, A. P. (2010). Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2, 21–26.
  15. McKinnon, J. J., Jayatilaka, D. & Spackman, M. A. (2007). Chem. Commun. 3814–3816. [DOI] [PubMed]
  16. Patel, N. B., Shaikh, F. M., Patel, H. R. & Rajani, D. (2016). J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 20, S451–S456.
  17. Rigaku OD (2018). CrysAlis PRO. Rigaku Oxford Diffraction, Yarnton, UK.
  18. Shahare, H. V., Gedam, S. S., Ahmed, R., Chavan, S. B. & Bhoyar, P. K. (2009). J. Pharm. Res. 8, 146–148.
  19. Sheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8.
  20. Sheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.
  21. Siddiqui, N., Alam, P. & Ahsan, W. (2009). Arch. Pharm. Chem. Life Sci. 342, 173–181. [DOI] [PubMed]
  22. Spackman, M. A. & Jayatilaka, D. (2009). CrystEngComm, 11, 19–32.
  23. Sridhar, S. & Rajendraprasad, Y. (2012). E-J. Chem. 9, 1810–1815.
  24. Srinivasan, K., Babu, V., Sridevi, C. & Joseph, A. (2007). Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 69, 470–473.
  25. Taj, T., Kamble, R. R., Gireesh, T. M., Hunnur, R. K. & Margankop, S. B. (2011). Eur. J. Med. Chem. 46, 4366–4373. [DOI] [PubMed]
  26. Turner, M. J., McKinnon, J. J., Wolff, S. K., Grimwood, D. J., Spackman, P. R., Jayatilaka, D. & Spackman, M. A. (2017). CrystalExplorer17. University of Western Australia. http://hirshfeldsurface.net

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989019013379/sj5579sup1.cif

e-75-01590-sup1.cif (462.8KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989019013379/sj5579Isup2.hkl

e-75-01590-Isup2.hkl (174.3KB, hkl)

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989019013379/sj5579Isup3.cml

CCDC references: 1956698, 1956698

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES