Ofcom’s packages 1–3 varied on three key principles
|
(1) Restrictions on advertising of all foods versus just HFSS foods |
Following the first consultation it was clear that the majority of responses preferred restricting advertising of only HFSS foods |
The eventual package of restrictions enacted was specific to HFSS foods |
Ofcom Executive Summary 1.12 |
(2) Total ban on food advertising versus volume based restrictions |
Almost all stakeholders did not consider volume based restrictions as being effective at reducing exposure to advertising and this option was dismissed following the first consultation |
There was a total ban enacted on HFSS food advertising in programming ‘of particular interest to’ children |
Ofcom Executive Summary 1.12 |
(3) Restrictions only on children’s channels versus all programmes ‘of particular interest’ to children, irrespective of channel |
Public health and civil society responses highlighted that children may watch adult TV and a ban on all less healthy food advertising before a 9pm watershed may be more effective than focusing specifically on children’s programming. Television and advertising industry responses worried that this would disproportionately impact advertising revenues |
Ofcom rejected the idea of a pre-9pm ban due to concerns about the effect it would have on broadcasters, programming and advertising revenues |
Ofcom Executive Summary 1.12 |
Further changes that were made
|
Restrictions should apply to children aged 4–9 years |
Many public health and civil society responses pointed out that children are legally defined as under 16 years |
The restrictions applied to children aged 4–15 years |
Ofcom Final Statement 4.9 |
All restrictions should start in April 2007 |
Children’s channels argued that they should be allowed a transitional period as they would be affected financially |
Children’s channels were allowed a phased implementation of restrictions, with final implementation by January 2009 |
Ofcom Final Statement 5.3/5.4 |