Table 4.
(A) Elderly | |||||||||
Partial regression coefficient | SE | Standardised coefficient | T-value | Significance probability | R2 | Adjusted R2 | Significance probability | ||
Model 1 | (Constant) | 0.106 | 0.117 | 0.906 | 0.725 | 0.724 | *** | ||
ASP_METs | 1.191 | 0.043 | 0.852 | 27.483 | *** | ||||
Model 2 | (Constant) | −2.017 | 0.446 | −4.523 | *** | 0.747 | 0.745 | *** | |
ASP_METs | 1.198 | 0.042 | 0.856 | 28.719 | *** | ||||
Age | 0.029 | 0.006 | 0.147 | 4.918 | *** | ||||
Model 3 | (Constant) | −3.058 | 0.513 | −5.962 | *** | 0.759 | 0.757 | *** | |
ASP_METs | 1.201 | 0.041 | 0.859 | 29.486 | *** | ||||
Age | 0.034 | 0.006 | 0.171 | 5.745 | *** | ||||
Weight | 0.011 | 0.003 | 0.115 | 3.843 | *** |
(B) Younger | |||||||||
Partial regression coefficient | SE | Standardised coefficient | T-value | Significance probability | R2 | Adjusted R2 | Significance probability | ||
Model 1 | (Constant) | 0.445 | 0.071 | 6.298 | *** | 0.77 | 0.77 | *** | |
ASP_METs | 0.884 | 0.024 | 0.878 | 37.268 | *** | ||||
Model 2 | (Constant) | −0.309 | 0.133 | −2.32 | * | 0.792 | 0.791 | *** | |
ASP_METs | 0.885 | 0.023 | 0.879 | 39.187 | *** | ||||
Weight | 0.012 | 0.002 | 0.147 | 6.563 | *** | ||||
Model 3 | (Constant) | −0.504 | 0.143 | −3.521 | *** | 0.798 | 0.796 | *** | |
ASP_METs | 0.884 | 0.022 | 0.878 | 39.623 | *** | ||||
Weight | 0.01 | 0.002 | 0.126 | 5.503 | *** | ||||
Age | 0.008 | 0.002 | 0.079 | 3.44 | ** |
Dependent variable: METs measured using Douglas bag method (DB_METs).
Independent variables: age, sex, weight, body mass index (BMI) and METs predicted using Active style Pro HJA-750C (ASP_METs).
*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.
ASP_METs, METs predicted by Active style Pro HJA-750C.