1 |
20 semi-structured interviews with ICU staff to generate items for the Footprints Form
8 nurses, 2 physicians, 5 respiratory therapists, 2 physiotherapists, 1 chaplain, 1 medical student and 1 research coordinator
|
Paper-based form was favoured.
Form to be placed in common location (ie, front of the medical chart).
Selected items from form transcribed onto whiteboard in the patient’s room.
Photo of the patient encouraged was for the whiteboard.
|
2 |
|
16 patients aged 48–89 years (mean 67.1 years) were included.
5 families (participation rate 93.8%) completed the form (7 interviewer-administered and 8 self-administered).
Whiteboard data: the date, the patient’s preferred name, clinician, name of the family spokesperson, aids used at home, milestones in the patient’s life, important issues to share and a message centre for family and ICU team.
|
3 |
|
21 families and 30 clinicians (response rates 80.4%, 100%, respectively).
Footprints was perceived to foster holistic, personalised care and promote humanism in practice.
|
4 |
|
|
5 |
A positive deviance group brainstorming exercise with 16 interdisciplinary colleagues was held
Strategies were identified to encourage completion of the Footprints Forms and Whiteboards, and to generate additional implementation suggestions
|
Several strategies were generated to increase completion (eg, better accessibility of forms for unit communication clerks and clinicians for distribution, and providing forms in patient rooms and waiting room for families to complete). More results are found in table 3.
|
6 |
|
57 patients audited serving as baseline audit A.
Magnets (100%) and markers (98.2%) for the Whiteboards were widely available, but the Footprints Form was completed for only 9 (15.8%) of patients.
Of those 9 patients, 6 (66.7%) had a copy of the Footprints Form hanging from the whiteboard and data from it included on the whiteboard.
For 48 patients without completed Footprints Forms, today's date and clinician names were recorded on the whiteboard for 34 (70.8%).
|