Table 3.

Univariable and multivariable analyses of EQ-5D-5L health-related dimensions according to exposure to flooding

	OR (95% CI)	aOR (95% CI)* †
M odel 1: Comparing flooded and disrupted with unaffected participants
Mobility problems
Unaffected	Ref	Ref
Disrupted	0.87 (0.51 to 1.49)	0.98 (0.48 to 2.02)
Flooded	1.09 (0.59 to 2.02)	1.04 (0.44 to 2.46)
Self-care problems‡
Unaffected	Ref	Ref
Disrupted	1.73 (0.58 to 5.12)	1.61 (0.41 to 6.31)
Flooded	1.98 (0.60 to 6.52)	1.62 (0.33 to 7.91)
Activity problems
Unaffected	Ref	Ref
Disrupted	1.15 (0.64 to 2.07)	1.59 (0.70 to 3.60)
Flooded	1.68 (0.87 to 3.25)	1.85 (0.72 to 4.79)
Pain/discomfort
Unaffected	Ref	Ref
Disrupted	0.92 (0.58 to 1.46)	0.95 (0.54 to 1.68)
Flooded	1.14 (0.67 to 1.95)	1.01 (0.50 to 2.02)
Anxiety/depression
Unaffected	Ref	Ref
Disrupted	1.51 (0.84 to 2.70)	1.46 (0.73 to 2.91)
Flooded	7.72 (4.11 to 14.50)	8.59 (4.02 to 18.36)
M odel 2: Comparing repeat with single flooded participants
			Mobility problems
Single flooded	Ref	Ref
Repeat flooded	1.16 (0.52 to 2.63)	0.85 (0.28 to 2.54)
Self-care problems‡
Single flooded	Ref	Ref
Repeat flooded	0.82 (0.23 to 3.01)	0.42 (0.08 to 2.29)
Activity problems
Single flooded	Ref	Ref
Repeat flooded	0.74 (0.33 to 1.64)	0.71 (0.24 to 2.11)
Pain/discomfort
Single flooded	Ref	Ref
Repeat flooded	0.88 (0.43 to 1.77)	0.52 (0.21 to 1.26)
Anxiety/depression
Single flooded	Ref	Ref
Repeat flooded	1.20 (0.62 to 2.32)	1.13 (0.51 to 2.51)

*Adjusted for age group, sex, local authority, marital status, education level, employment, deprivation score and pre-existing illness.

†Number of observations included in all multivariable models was 484. Both models 1 and 2 included the same participants, but the reference group differed. ORs are only presented for the comparison of interest.

‡Due to very small numbers of participants with ‘severe/extreme problems’ on the self-care dimension, the ‘severe/extreme’ and ‘moderate’ categories were combined.

aOR, adjusted OR.