TABLE 4.
Variables | No PeriMS | PeriMS | F/X2 | df | p | Partial eta squared |
Age (years) | 31.0 (6.6) | 31.5 (7.7) | 0.05 | 1/39 | 0.831 | – |
Family income (baht) | 105.250 (104.245) | 64.263 (42.911) | 2.53 | 1/39 | 0.120 | – |
Age menarche (years) | 12.7 (1.2) | 12.9 (1.3) | 0.30 | 1/39 | 0.588 | – |
Length cycle (days) | 27.7 (2.4) | 27.4 (5.7) | 0.09 | 1/39 | 0.763 | – |
Duration menses (days) | 4.4 (1.3) | 5.0 (1.5) | 2.17 | 1/39 | 0.149 | – |
Education (years) | 16.0 (0.8) | 15.9 (1.4) | 0.05 | 1/39 | 0.818 | – |
Body mass index (kg/m2) | 21.7 (3.5) | 22.9 (3.8) | 1.08 | 1/39 | 0.305 | – |
Children No/Yes | 19/3 | 13/6 | Ψ = 0.216 | – | 0.166 | – |
DRSP (28 days) | 774.8 (58.0) | 1119.6 (162.6) | 86.53 | 1/39 | <0.001 | 0.689 |
DRSP premenstrual week | 132.6 (18.2) | 252.2 (99.3) | 30.82 | 1/39 | <0.001 | 0.441 |
DRSP postmenstrual week | 133.1 (19.9) | 175.7 (56.9) | 10.83 | 1/39 | <0.001 | 0.217 |
DRSP (T1,T2,T3,T4) | 27.0 (1.3) | 38.3 (1.9) | 35.56 | 1/157 | <0.001 | 0.185 |
Oestradiol T1 (pmole/L) | 266.1 (195.5) | 315.3 (356.7) | 0.019 | 1/38 | 0.892 | – |
Oestradial T2 (pmole/L) | 723.9 (528.2) | 476.5 (399.2) | 4.50 | 1/38 | 0.040 | – |
Oestradiol T3 (pmole/L) | 669.3 (260.1) | 518.9 (292.7) | 4.62 | 1/38 | 0.038 | – |
Oestradiol T4 (pmole/L) | 308.9 (183.9) | 252.1 (143.0) | 0.85 | 1/38 | 0.361 | – |
Progesterone T1 (nmole/L) | 0.51 (0.28) | 0.56 (0.39) | 1.45 | 1/38 | 0.236 | – |
Progesterone T2 (nmole/L) | 4.33 (7.82) | 2.68 (3.39) | 0.26 | 1/38 | 0.614 | |
Progesterone T3 (nmole/L) | 39.72 (23.43) | 29.05 (30.16) | 6.63 | 1/38 | 0.014 | |
Progesterone T4 (nmole/L) | 13.71 (13.49) | 8.95 (12.32) | 2.54 | 1/38 | 0.120 | |
DRSP depression score | 9.7 (0.5) | 14.3 (0.6) | 34.37 | 1/157 | <0.001 | 0.180 |
DRSP physio-somatic score | 6.8 (0.4) | 10.1 (0.4) | 36.77 | 1/157 | <0.001 | 0.190 |
DSRP eating-breast score | 5.0 (0.3) | 6.6 (0.3) | 13.42 | 1/157 | <0.001 | 0.079 |
DRSP anxiety score | 5.6 (0.3) | 7.9 (0.3) | 27.81 | 1/157 | <0.001 | 0.150 |
All results are shown as mean (SD); All hormonal data were processed in Ln transformation.