Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 5;6(6):ENEURO.0306-19.2019. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0306-19.2019

Table 3.

Slow-oscillation characteristics during afternoon nap closed-loop stimulation (experiment 1)

Stim Sham p Value
Number of SOs 166.67 (27.76) 154.58 (17.65) 0.52
SO amplitude (μV) 147.36 (13.04) 143.17 (9.89) 0.40
SO slope (μV/s) 278.68 (26.09) 275.92 (20.30) 0.83
Duration (s) 1.13 (0.01) 1.15 (0.01) 0.04

Mean ± SEM number of slow oscillations (identified off-line; see Materials and Methods) during the entire recording, amplitude (negative half-wave-to-peak), slope, and duration between stim and sham conditions. Duration of SO in the stimulation condition was significantly shorter compared with the sham condition, suggesting that the induced SO oscillation peaked at a higher frequency compared with the sham condition (∼1 Hz)