Table 4.
Data is reported as mean ± standard deviation (range). N.r., data not raised; d, days; m, months.
| Functional Outcome after Nonrigid AC Joint Repair | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study | Technique | Number of Patients | Patient Age (y) | Interval Trauma to Surgery (d) | Follow Up (m) | Constant Score | DASH | UCLA |
| Wang et al. (2018) [1] | allogenic Tendon Graft | 8 | 49 (23–72) * | <21 | 29.8 (25–43) | 94.4 (86–100) | n.r. | 33.5 (30–35) |
| Yin et al. (2018) [44] | Tendon Graft (conjoined Tendon Autograft) | 25 | 46.28 (20–68) | 4.86 ± 1.17 | 19.92 ± 2.92 | 89.56 ± 2.80 | n.r. | n.r |
| Hann et al. (2017) [17] | Double TightRope + AC cerclage | 59 | 43.3 (24.4–56) * | <21 | 26.4 (20.3–61) * | 90 (33–100) * | n.r. | n.r |
| Vulliet et al. (2017) [45] | Double Tight Rope | 22 | 38.8 ± 8.7 | 3 ± 1.9 | 27.7 ± 8.3 | 94.3 ± 4.4 | 2.0 ± 2.6 | n.r |
| Beris et al. (2013) [46] | Single TightRope | 12 | 27.5 (19–39) | 5 (2–14) | 18.3 (12–30) | 94.8 (84–100) | 0.25 (0-3) | n.r. |
| Tiefenboeck et al. (2018) [47] | LARS | 47 | 37.3 (17–65) * | 8 (<14) | 90 (25–159) * | 93 (5–100) * | 2.6 (0–31) * | 35 (20–35) * |
| Lu et al. (2013) [48] | LARS | 24 | 31 (21–45) * | <42 | 36 (6–60) * | 94.5 ± 9.3 | n.r. | n.r. |
| Rosslenbroich et al. (2015) [42] | MINAR | 83 | 39 (17–80) * | 6 (0–22) | 39 (12–78) | 94.7 (61–100) | n.r. | n.r. |
| Breuer et al. (2018) | MINAR | 51 | 43 (19–63) | 7 (0–21) | 55 (29–90) * | 95 ±8.8 | 9.1 ± 14.3 | 31 ± 4.9 |
* Data reported as median (range).