Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 11;8(10):1654. doi: 10.3390/jcm8101654

Table 3.

Predictive accuracy of selected imaging markers to identify patients undergoing AV surgery.

AUC (95% CI) Cutoff Value Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%)
Markers of LV remodeling
 2D ECHO LVESD, mm 0.69 (0.57–0.80) 37
40
45
85
55
15
56
69
94
 2D ECHO LVESDi, mm/m2 0.66 (0.54–0.78) 18
20
22
80
30
15
53
75
90
 MRI LVEDV, mL 0.68 (0.53–0.83) 281 50 84
 MRI LVEDVi, mL/m2 0.69 (0.54–0.84) 110
124
139
80
70
55
53
70
85
 MRI LVESV, mL 0.64 (0.48–0.80) 121 50 84
 MRI LVESVi, mL/m2 0.65 (0.49–0.81) 42
56
58
70
60
50
53
77
81
 2D ECHO GLS, % 0.61 (0.47–0.70) −17.5 50 71
Markers of AR severity
 Diastolic flow reversal velocity, cm/s 0.72 (0.59–0.85) 22 65 78
 2D ECHO RV, mL 0.58 (0.43–0.74) 93 40 88
 2D ECHO RF, % 0.61 (0.47–0.76) 47 50 73
 3D VCA (mm2) 0.76 (0.64–0.88) 29
31
36
80
75
65
63
71
81
 MRI RV, mL 0.79 (0.70–0.88) 41
45
95
90
56
61
 MRI RF, % 0.77 (0.68–0.86) 34 95 55
Integrative approach
 2D ECHO integrative approach 0.65 (0.52–0.78) Severe AR 70 60
 3D ECHO VCA ≥30 mm2 and
2D ECHO LVESD or LVESDi
NA LVESD >40 mm
LVESD >45 mm
LVESDi >20 mm/m2
LVESDi >22 mm/m2
80
80
80
80
71
97
77
87
 MRI regurgitant volume ≥45 mL and
MRI LVEDVi or LVESVi
NA LVEDVi >139 mL/m2
LVESVI >62 mL/m2
90
90
78
78
 MRI regurgitant fraction ≥34% and
MRI LVEDVi or LVESVi
NA LVEDVi >139 mL/m2
LVESVI >62 mL/m2
95
95
89
89

2D, two-dimensional; 3D, three dimensional, AUC, area under curve; ECHO, echocardiography; GLS, global longitudinal strain; LV, left ventricle; LVEDV, left ventricular end-diastolic volume; LVEDVi, left ventricular end-diastolic volume index; LVESD, left ventricular end-systolic diameter; LVESDi, left ventricular end-systolic diameter index; LVESV, left ventricular end-systolic volume; LVESVi, left ventricular end-systolic volume index; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; RF, regurgitant fraction; RV, regurgitant volume; VCA, vena contracta area.