Table 5.
Comparison of different GC-sensor systems with developed FBAR sensor in terms of limit of detection, dynamic range, linearity, application field and data process method, adapted with permission from [184].
| GC-Sensor | Sensing Performance | Application Field | Data Process Method | Ref. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Limit of Detection | Dynamic Range | Linearity | ||||
| Micro-cantilever | Sub-ppb | / | Good | Building-related illness | PCA | [185] |
| Semiconductor metal oxide detector | Sub-ppb | 0.1–5 ppb | Non-linearity | Environmental pollution | / | [186] |
| Micro-capacitive detector | 0.1 ppm | 0.1–1 ppm | Good | Indoor pollutants | / | [187] |
| Acoustic wave (AW) device | / | / | Good | Food products and antiseptic agent | PCA | [188] |
| Nano-electromechanical resonators | Sub-ppb | 0.6–1500 ppb | Good | / | / | [189] |
| Film bulk acoustic wave resonator | 1 ppm | 50–500 ppm | Good | Exhaled breath detection | PCA | This work |