Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 10;15:7–13. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.08.015

Table 2.

Meta-analysis results of prediction of postoperative FEV1: Mean difference.

Prediction technique Studies Mean difference (measured − predicted FEV1) 95% Confidence interval I2
CT — volume & density 3 (n = 109) 71 ml 38 to 103 0%
Perfusion scintigraphy 7 (n = 194) 101 ml − 11 to 214 88%
SPECT–CT 2 (n = 59) 107 ml − 10 to 225 66%
CT — perfusion 2 (n = 65) 143 ml 59 to 228 0%
Segment counting 4 (n = 145) 192 ml 88 to 295 74%
Subsegment counting 3 (n = 82) 233 ml 135 to 332 65%
SPECT 1 (n = 30) 10 ml − 114 to 134 Single study
CT — ventilation 1 (n = 30) 70 ml − 24 to 164 Single study
CT — volumetry 1 (n = 30) 90 ml − 21 to 201 Single study
CT — volume & partial density 1 (n = 23) 266 ml 172 to 360 Single study
Ventilation scintigraphy 1 (n = 23) 312 ml 188 to 435 Single study