Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 30;75(Pt 11):959–968. doi: 10.1107/S2059798319012877

Table 2. SAD phasing results for different error models.

Values in parentheses are for the highest resolution bin.

Protocol 1 2 3
Weight σhj σEv11
Resolution (Å) 80.78–1.80 (1.86–1.80)
I 13.8 (2.7) 59.7 (2.0) 14.0 (1.4)
CC1/2 (%) 99.9 (73.8) 99.8 (63.3) 99.9 (81.4)
Zn2+ peak height (σ) 53.1 50.5 67.0
No. of sites found by HySS § 6 ± 0 6 ± 0 6 ± 0
No. of residues built (of 316)§ 252.4 ± 15.2 104.1 ± 1.4 297.2 ± 6.5
Model–map CC§ (%) 71.0 ± 0.4 30.3 ± 0.2 80.0 ± 0.1
R work § (%) 27.4 ± 1.8 54.8 ± 0.3 21.2 ± 1.3
R free § (%) 29.9 ± 2.0 57.3 ± 0.8 23.7 ± 1.7

As in Table 1, for a given weight w where w = 1/σ2.

These are higher than in Fig. 3 because the higher intensity observations are given a higher weight during merging.

§

Numbers are mean ± standard deviation over ten trials with differing random-number seeds.

Phased map correlation to the known structure.