Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 4;2(1):e1. doi: 10.2196/cardio.8199

Table 3.

Responsiveness of heart rate devices to change in walking activity.

Cadence (%) Five-min epochs One-min epochs
FBTa
Actigraph
GARb
Actigraph

Percentage change (95% CI)c
P (n)d
Percentage change
(95% CI)

P (n)

Percentage change
(95% CI)

P (n)

Percentage change
(95% CI)

P (n)
50-79 6.3 (3.2-9.3) <.001 (27) 4.7 (0.6-8.8) .03 (20) 2.8 (0.9-4.7) .006 (30) 3.5 (0.7-6.3) .02 (28)
80-99 15.4 (10.0-20.7) <.001 (13) 11.8 (−0.2 to 23.7) .05 (7) 3.5 (0.5-6.5) .02 (26) 6.6 (3.8-9.5) <.001 (25)
≥100 16.8 (7.9-25.8) .005 (6) 17.8 (−26.3 to 62.0) .22 (3) 1.8 (−1.6 to 5.3) .27 (14) 12.9 (5.7-20.2) .003 (9)

aFBT: Fitbit Charge HR.

bGAR: Garmin Vivosmart.

cValues presented are mean increase in heart rate from rest (“percentage change”), expressed as a percentage of estimated maximum heart rate, with 95% CI in parentheses.

dP values correspond to t tests comparing heart rate at rest and different cadences. Note the sample sizes (n) differ between comparisons as not all participants walked at each cadence, or there were no valid heart rate data at that activity level.