Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 19;43(5):627–639. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2018.0141

Table 2. Comparison of baseline characteristics and incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus according to four body composition phenotypes at baseline.

Characteristic Men Women
Low muscle/low fat High muscle/low fat Low muscle/high fat High muscle/high fat Low muscle/low fat High muscle/low fat Low muscle/high fat High muscle/high fat
Number 3,585 (33) 1,915 (18) 1,802 (17) 3,466 (32) 2,041 (31) 1,274 (20) 1,249 (19) 1,948 (30)
Age, yr 48.8±8.2 46.8±7.6 50.7±8.1 47.8±7.8 44.5±8.5 46.7±7.2 49.7±8.9a 49.5±8.5a
Height, cm 170.4±5.5 173.9±5.3 167.5±5.3 170.9±5.8 159.2±4.8 160.7±4.7 156.1±4.9 158.4±4.9
Weight, kg 64.0±5.4 74.0±5.2 69.6±4.9 80.4±7.5 50.2±3.7 56.1±3.8 55.4±3.9 63.4±6.3
BMI, kg/m2 22.1±1.5 24.5±1.1 24.8±1.3 27.3±1.9 19.8±1.3 21.7±1.1 22.7±1.3 25.3±2.3
LBM, kg 53.5±4.3b 62.0±4.3c 53.4±3.6b 62.0±5.2c 39.4±2.6 44.3±2.7c 39.0±2.6 44.6±3.4c
LBMI, kg/m2 18.4±1.0 20.5±0.8 19.1±0.7 21.1±1.0 15.6±0.8 17.2±0.7 16.0±0.7 17.8±1.0
ASM, kg 24.3±2.2 28.4±2.2 24.0±1.9 28.2±2.6 17.4±1.4 19.8±1.5 17.0±1.4 20.0±1.8
ASMI, kg/m2 8.4±0.4 9.4±0.3 8.5±0.3 9.6±0.5 6.9±0.3 7.7±0.3 7.0±0.3 7.8±0.4
Fat mass, kg 10.7 (9.0–12.2) 12.2 (10.8–13.4) 15.7 (14.4–17.5) 17.7 (15.7–20.0) 11.0 (9.4–12.4) 12.1 (10.5–13.3) 16.0 (14.7–17.6) 17.7 (15.8–20.7)
FMI, kg/m2 3.7 (3.1–4.2) 4.1 (3.6–4.4) 5.5 (5.1–6.2) 5.9 (5.3–6.8) 4.3 (3.7–4.9) 4.7 (4.1–5.2) 6.5 (6.0–7.2) 7.0 (6.2–8.2)
Waist, cm 80±5 85±4 87±5 92±6 69±5 74±5 76±5 81±7
Smoking, % 36.6b 38.1b 28.6 36.0b 3.0 3.8 1.2 1.8
Alcohol use (≥ ×2/wk), % 50.0 58.6 52.9 57.5 12.2b 12.9b 10.7b 12.7b
Exercise (≥ ×3/wk), % 52.6 56.7 48.6a 48.2a 56.0 69.7 55.3 58.6
Hypertension, % 16.1b 17.3b 32.0a 31.5a 6.4 8.5 17.0 22.0
SBP, mm Hg 117±13 119±12 122±13a 123±13a 108±13 109±14 114±15 116±15
DBP, mm Hg 74±9b 74±9b 77±9a 77±9a 67±8b 68±9b 71±9a 72±10a
HDL-C, mmol/L 1.45±0.34 1.37±0.31 1.32±0.28 1.27±0.28 1.73±0.36 1.68±0.39 1.60±0.36 1.50±0.34
TG, mmol/L 1.20 (0.89–1.69) 1.27 (0.95–1.80) 1.54 (1.14–2.12) 1.61 (1.18–2.26) 0.83 (0.65–1.13)b 0.83 (0.64–1.17)b 1.05 (0.80–1.46) 1.10 (0.81–1.54)
FPG, mmol/L 5.5±1.1b 5.5±0.9b 5.7±1.2a 5.7±1.1a 5.1±0.7b 5.2±0.8b 5.3±0.7 5.4±0.9
HbA1c, % (mmol/mol) 5.4±0.7 (36±8)b 5.4±0.6 (36±7)b 5.6±0.8 (38±9)a 5.6±0.8 (38±9)a 5.2±0.5 (33±5)b 5.3±0.5 (34±5)b 5.4±0.5 (36±5) 5.5±0.7 (37±8)
HOMA-IR 1.2 (0.9–1.8) 1.4 (1.0–2.0) 1.9 (1.3–2.7) 2.1 (1.5–3.1) 1.1 (08–1.6)b 1.1 (0.8–1.6)b 1.5 (1.0–2.0) 1.6 (1.1–2.4)
HOMA-β 59 (42–81) 64 (47–90) 79 (57–110) 87 (63–122) 67 (49–92)b 65 (46–89)b 75 (55–102) 82 (61–115)
Incident diabetes 121 (3.4)b 71 (3.7)b 117 (6.5) 284 (8.2) 18 (0.9) 25 (2.0) 34 (2.7) 101 (5.2)

Values are presented as number (%), mean±standard deviation, or median (interquartile range). All continuous variables were significantly different among the four groups with analysis of variance (ANOVA) or Kruskal-Wallis test except for those designated by the same symbols such as a,b,c. All categorical variables were also significantly different with chi-square tests except for those designated by the same symbols a,b,c.

BMI, body mass index; LBM, lean body mass; LBMI, lean body mass index; ASM, appendicular skeletal muscle mass; ASMI, appendicular skeletal muscle mass index; FMI, fat mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; HOMA-β, homeostasis model assessment of β-cell function index.

Not significantly different from a“low muscle/high fat” group, b“low muscle/low fat” group, c“high muscle/low fat” group by post hoc analysis with Tukey test or chi-square test.