Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Acad Radiol. 2019 May 7;27(2):244–252. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.03.014

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Results of the fully crossed validation study. A total of 20 patient datasets reconstructed with 4 different noise reduction methods (NRMs) were read by 10 radiologist trainees. The JAFROC figure of merit was estimated using a random-reader, random-case analysis approach that penalized performance for non-localizations (“false positive”) in cases with and without true lesions (JAFROC1 analysis).