Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 17;1(4):23. doi: 10.3390/vision1040023

Table 1.

Summary statistics of changes in ERG components during light adaptation. All data shown in Figure 1C and Figure 2C were tested with a Friedmann-test, which considers all measured time points, while the animal was light adapted. Significance levels were corrected via the Bonferroni method: αBonferroni = 0.005. p-values that were below this significance level are highlighted.

ERG Component Protocol % Change During Light Adaptation Mean ± SD p-Value
b-wave amplitude [µV] 25 cd/m2 +21.8 ±18.8 <0.0005
40 cd/m2 +22.3 ± 22.4 0.007 1
implicit time [ms] 25 cd/m2 −7.7 ± 4.2 <0.0005
40 cd/m2 −4.8 ± 1.8 <0.0005
PhNR amplitude [µV] 25 cd/m2 +85.2 ± 116.0 0.007 1
40 cd/m2 +47.5 ± 228.1 0.766
implicit time [ms] 25 cd/m2 −8.5 ± 12.5 0.722
40 cd/m2 +5.6 ± 13.3 0.722
2nd oscillatory potential (OP) peak amplitude [µV] 25 cd/m2 +101.6 ± 103.9 0.453
40 cd/m2 +133.9 ± 184.2 0.066
implicit time [ms] 25 cd/m2 −1.7 ± 1.7 0.002
40 cd/m2 −1.2 ± 2.2 0.140
3rd OP peak amplitude [µV] 25 cd/m2 +70.6 ± 57.9 <0.0005
40 cd/m2 +102.9 ± 127.7 0.017 1
implicit time [ms] 25 cd/m2 −5.3 ± 1.8 <0.0005
40 cd/m2 +0.7 ± 2.5 0.002
all OP (FFT analysis) amplitude [µV] 25 cd/m2 +40.8 ± 47.4 0.008 1
40 cd/m2 +29.2 ± 25.1 0.131

1 p-value was not significant after Bonferroni correction for multiple testing.Highlighted p-values are below significance level.