Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 24;11(10):2285. doi: 10.3390/nu11102285

Table 3.

Effect sizes for taste – difference in food intake in cancer patients.

Taste Food-Related Intake a or Change in Intake b in Patients with Low DT (Mean ± SD). Intake a or Change in Intake b in Patients with High DT (Mean ± SD). Effect
d (95% CI)
Reference
Sweet Zinc (mg/day) 17 ± 7 a 9.6 ± 4.5 a 1.18 (0.41, 1.96) Sánchez-Lara, 2010 [24]
Sweet Fat (g/day) +27.39 b −15.1 b 0.97 (0.31, 1.62) Turcott, 2016 [26]
Sweet Carbohydrate (g/day) 240 ± 84 a 167 ± 81 a 0.88 (0.13, 1.63) Sánchez-Lara, 2010 [24]
Sweet Animal protein (g/day) +18.6 b −15.1 b 0.86 (0.21, 1.51) Turcott, 2016 [26]
Sweet Protein (g/day) +30.8 b −7.9 b 0.81 (0.16, 1.45) Turcott, 2016 [26]
Sweet Calories (kcal/day) 1970 ± 658 a 1450 ± 833 a 0.69 (−0.04, 1.43) Sánchez-Lara, 2010 [24]
Sweet Iron (mg/day) +8.4 b −1.11 b 0.65 (0.01, 1.29) Turcott, 2016 [26]
Sweet Appetite * 0.59 (0.00, 1.18) Carson, 1997 [20]
Sweet Protein (g/day) 74 ± 45 a 53 ± 32 a 0.54 (−0.19, 1.27) Sánchez-Lara, 2010 [24]
Bitter Calories/day 2124 ± 812 a 1493 ± 452 a 0.96 (0.20, 1.72) Sánchez-Lara, 2010 [24]
Bitter Carbohydrate (g/day) 254 ± 98 a 182 ± 58 a 0.89 (0.14, 1.64) Sánchez-Lara, 2010 [24]
Bitter Fat (g/day) 87 ± 38 a 62 ± 22 a 0.81 (0.06, 1.55) Sánchez-Lara, 2010 [24]
Bitter Protein (g/day) 83 ± 53 a 52 ± 17 a 0.79 (0.04, 1.53) Sánchez-Lara, 2010 [24]

Effect size d represents the standardized difference of means in food intake, calculated based on mean, standard deviation (SD), p-value, and sample size provided in the literature, between patients with a low/decreased DT and patients with high/increased DT. CI—95% confidence interval. a Mean intake in patients with low DT. b Change in the mean intake in patients with a decreased DT. * The study only reported the number of patients with increased or decreased appetite after chemotherapy and the significance (p-value) of the difference. “+” denotes an increase in intake.