Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 7;19:941. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4584-0

Table 2.

Identification accuracy rate of all anaerobic genera

Genus Proportion 95%CI Weight%
Bacteroides 96% 95–97% 6.79
Lactobacillus 95% 89–102% 5.16
Parabacteroides 94% 87–101% 4.88
Clostridium 92% 90–93% 6.73
Propionibacterium 91% 89–93% 6.55
Prevotella 91% 88–93% 6.48
Veillonella 91% 85–197% 5.25
Peptostreptococcus 90% 85–95% 5.60
Bifidobacterium 89% 76–103% 2.60
Solobacterium 88% 73–104% 2.27
Finegoldia 87% 83–91% 5.96
Capnocytophaga 86% 60–112% 1.01
Parvimonas 86% 82–91% 5.78
Peptoniphilus 86% 81–91% 5.59
Slackia 83% 67–98% 2.24
Actinomyces 81% 74–89% 4.66
Ruminococcus 80% 45–115% 0.59
Tissierella 80% 45–115% 0.59
Fusobacterium 79% 74–84% 5.61
Eggerthella 74% 63–85% 3.39
Actinobaculum 68% 46–91% 1.26
Atopobium 68% 51–85% 1.92
Anaerococcus 64% 54–73% 3.92
Flavonifracter 63% 29–96% 0.64
Eubacterium 57% 20–94% 0.55
Bilophila 56% 23–88% 0.68
Butyricimonas 56% 23–88% 0.68
Porphyromonas 50% 36–64% 2.59