Table 5.
The resistance rates of antifungal agents in different cities in China
| Species | Antifungal agent | Resistant (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beijing | Chongqing | Nanjing | China-SCAN study | Luzhou | ||
| C.albicans | FCA | 6.6 | 2.4 | 25.8 | 9.6 | 20.0 |
| VRC | 2.9 | 5.6 | 0 | 0 | 23.6 | |
| ITR | 4.9 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 16.0 | 28.2 | |
| 5-FC | 2.4 | 5.5 | ||||
| AMB | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| C.glabrata | FCA | 10.5 | 13.7 | 90.9 | 4.0 | 11.0 |
| VRC | 9.1 | 0 | 6.0 | 6.8 | ||
| ITR | 45.5 | 90.9 | 4.0 | 6.8 | ||
| 5-FC | 3.0 | 2.7 | ||||
| AMB | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| C.tropicalis | FCA | 10.6 | 2.2 | 68.4 | 6.0 | 29.7 |
| VRC | 10.6 | 0 | 8.7 | 0 | 27.0 | |
| ITR | 0 | 34.2 | 31.3 | 40.5 | ||
| 5-FC | 0 | 5.4 | ||||
| AMB | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| C.krusei | FCA | – | – | – | ||
| VRC | 0 | 0 | 25.0 | |||
| ITR | 66.7 | 0 | 33.4 | |||
| 5-FC | 0 | |||||
| AMB | 0 | 0 | ||||
| C.parapsilosis | FCA | 2.4 | 42.3 | 19.3 | 20.0 | |
| VRC | 0 | 0 | 3.6 | 20.0 | ||
| ITR | 2.4 | 3.8 | 39.8 | 20.0 | ||
| 5-FC | 0 | 0 | ||||
| AMB | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Total | FCA | 7.5 | 53.9 | 18.6 | ||
| VRC | 5.4 | 2.2 | 18.5 | |||
| ITR | 4.9 | 30.5 | 23.1 | |||
| 5-FC | 4.1 | |||||
| AMB | 0 | |||||
FCA fluconazole, ITR itraconazole, AMB amphotericin B, VRC voriconazole, 5-FC flucytosine