Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 6;19:297. doi: 10.1186/s12906-019-2726-y

Table 2.

Effects of increasing age and different treatments on the body weights (g) of ICR mice

Group Week
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Normal control 21.26 ± 1.18 26.60 ± 1.57 29.50 ± 1.02 32.32 ± 1.30 36.33 ± 1.25 38.34 ± 1.57 40.08 ± 1.60 42.77 ± 1.15
Model control 21.49 ± 1.24 26.59 ± 2.62 29.74 ± 1.28 32.40 ± 1.14 36.51 ± 1.32 35.68 ± 1.65d 35.04 ± 0.92d 34.19 ± 1.16d
Positive control 21.38 ± 1.05 26.77 ± 1.11 28.41 ± 1.67 32.33 ± 2.23 35.99 ± 2.62 36.54 ± 1.59ac 39.02 ± 2.39b 41.59 ± 2.92b
RIP (25 mg/kg) 21.26 ± 0.75 26.08 ± 1.43 27.67 ± 1.24ac 31.08 ± 1.57 33.86 ± 2.47ac 36.14 ± 2.42ac 38.00 ± 2.84bc 40.65 ± 1.25b
RIP (50 mg/kg) 21.56 ± 0.69 26.26 ± 0.85 30.85 ± 1.27 32.18 ± 0.84 35.54 ± 2.38 37.83 ± 2.89c 38.63 ± 3.06bc 40.12 ± 3.01b
RIP(100 mg/kg) 21.12 ± 1.43 26.82 ± 1.09 31.16 ± 1.24 33.73 ± 1.91 36.79 ± 1.57 37.81 ± 2.47c 38.27 ± 2.98bc 41.12 ± 2.16b

Results are given as mean body weights ± standard deviation (S.D.) (n = 10) and evaluated by one-way ANOVA followed by the Duncan’s multiple-range tests. Differences were considered to be statistically significant if P < 0.05

a P < 0.05, compared with model group

b P < 0.01, compared with model group

c P < 0.05, compared with normal group

d P < 0.01, compared with normal group