Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 6;19:807. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4656-2

Table 6.

Prescribing patterns among different groups of encounter characteristics (n = 8500)

Encounter characteristics Median medicines per encounter (interquartile range) Percentage of encounters with generic medicines Percentage of encounters with antibiotics Percentage of encounters with injections Percentage of encounters with essential medicines Percentage of encounters with TCPMs
Gender
 Male 2.0 (1.0, 3.0) 91.4% 15.1% 4.2% 71.6% 51.4%
 Female 2.0 (1.0, 2.0) 91.1% 15.2% 3.2% 69.5% 53.4%
 Missing 18
 Z or χ2 −1.743 0.008 0.023 5.705 4.296 3.539
P value 0.081 0.928 0.880 0.017 * 0.038 * 0.060
Age group
 0–14 2.0 (1.0, 2.0) 85.9% 32.4% 5.9% 55.3% 63.5%
 15–24 2.0 (1.0, 2.0) 87.6% 33.0% 7.6% 69.7% 62.2%
 25–44 2.0 (1.0, 2.0) 89.9% 23.2% 3.7% 67.6% 62.7%
 45–59 2.0 (1.0, 2.0) 91.1% 13.5% 2.9% 69.2% 51.3%
 ≥ 60 2.0 (1.0, 3.0) 92.8% 11.2% 4.1% 73.9% 47.8%
 Missing 43
 χ2 12.549 22.742 211.431 17.435 47.095 112.701
P value 0.014 * 0.000 * 0.000 * 0.002 * 0.000 * 0.000 *
Reason for encounter
 Present with at least one symptom 2.0 (1.0, 3.0) 92.3% 22.9% 4.9% 69.1% 67.1%
 Regular follow up 1.0 (1.0, 2.0) 93.9% 3.9% 2.7% 70.2% 23.4%
 Prescription refill without other complaint 2.0 (1.0, 2.0) 97.0% 4.3% 1.5% 79.8% 38.0%
 Other reasons 0 (0, 0) 22.1% 6.7% 5.0% 15.4% 7.0%
 χ2 613.625 1921.523 553.674 57.440 544.088 1139.777
P value 0.000 * 0.000 * 0.000 * 0.000 * 0.000 * 0.000 *
Insurance type
 PIIS 2.0 (1.0, 3.0) 94.5% 16.6% 2.8% 75.5% 58.6%
 EBMS 2.0 (1.0, 3.0) 94.2% 14.1% 3.1% 71.3% 59.2%
 NRCMS 2.0 (1.0, 2.0) 88.9% 13.6% 4.0% 68.1% 44.3%
 Other insurance 2.0 (1.0, 3.0) 93.3% 17.3% 3.7% 68.7% 57.3%
 No insurance 2.0 (1.0, 2.0) 81.9% 23.2% 8.1% 62.6% 52.4%
 Missing 99
 χ2 116.527 124.972 34.935 31.825 49.315 164.359
P value 0.000 * 0.000 * 0.000 * 0.000 * 0.000 * 0.000 *
First time visit
 Yes 2.0 (1.0, 2.0) 81.8% 22.3% 6.0% 59.1% 52.8%
 No 2.0 (1.0, 2.0) 92.0% 14.7% 3.5% 71.1% 52.5%
 Missing 229
 Z or χ2 −4.823 64.990 21.901 8.014 33.663 0.020
P value 0.000 * 0.000 * 0.000 * 0.005 * 0.000 * 0.888
Contracted patient
 Yes 2.0 (1.0, 3.0) 92.4% 12.6% 3.3% 72.6% 50.2%
 No 2.0 (1.0, 2.0) 89.6% 19.2% 4.3% 66.7% 56.1%
 Missing 259
 Z or χ2 −6.092 20.185 65.265 5.847 32.177 26.959
P value 0.000 * 0.000 * 0.000 * 0.016 * 0.000 * 0.000 *
Chronic disease
 Yes 2.0 (1.0, 3.0) 93.2% 9.3% 3.1% 75.3% 43.3%
 No 2.0 (1.0, 2.0) 88.8% 23.0% 4.4% 63.9% 65.0%
 Z or χ2 −7.330 52.042 305.195 9.166 128.968 395.725
P value 0.000 * 0.000 * 0.000 * 0.002 * 0.000 * 0.000 *
Number of problems involved
 < 3 2.0 (1.0, 2.0) 90.5% 14.0% 3.8% 68.1% 49.8%
 ≥ 3 3.0 (2.0, 4.0) 96.8% 22.3% 3.1% 85.0% 69.0%
 Z or χ2 −29.714 50.620 54.311 1.447 139.293 149.682
P value 0.000 * 0.000 * 0.000 * 0.229 0.000 * 0.000 *
Consultation time
 < 5 min 2.0 (1.0, 2.0) 85.9% 13.6% 4.4% 64.2% 48.6%
 5–10 min 2.0 (1.0, 3.0) 93.9% 15.9% 3.5% 75.6% 54.9%
 > 10 min 2.0 (1.0, 3.0) 95.3% 17.0% 3.2% 71.3% 54.7%
 Missing 227
 χ2 160.473 171.193 11.100 5.549 99.659 28.615
P value 0.000 * 0.000 * 0.004 * 0.062 0.000 * 0.000 *

Abbreviation: TCPM Traditional Chinese patent medicine, PIIS Public institution insurance scheme, EBMS Employee basic medical scheme, NRCMS New rural cooperative medical scheme

Note: other reasons for encounter included check-up, transfusion and injection, sickness certificate, etc.

*Significant in bold