Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 31;10:1405. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01405

Table 3.

Relative abundance of inoculated fungi in plants that were subject to different fungicide treatments.

No inoculation Phatogen inoculation ACEA1 inoculation Phatogen + ACEA1 inoculation
C CuS Sys Blad C CuS Sys Blad C CuS Sys Blad C CuS Sys Blad
Phaeomoniella chlamydospora 11.6* 60.7* 64.0* 33.3* 4.9* 17.6 1.8 1.8 0.4 13.9* 2.0* 2.9 6.6*
Alternaria alternata
(Alternaria sp.)
13.1 22.3* 4.3* 2.1* 5.0 5.5* 11.0* 4.3*
Epicoccum nigrum
(Pleosporales incertae sedis)
2.0 2.8* 7.6* 24.1* 12.9* 6.4 25.9* 40.4*
Aureobasidium pullulans 0.8 0.7 0.2 2.5*
Cladosporium sp. 0.3 0.3 0.1 2.5 0.2 2.7*

Grapevine cuttings were non-inoculated (No inoculation), inoculated with P. chlamydospora (Pathogen inoculation), or inoculated with a consortium of fungal wood endophytes (ACEA1 inoculation) or a combination of both (Pathogen + ACEA1 inoculation). Grapevines were treated with a control (potassium permanganate; C) or copper oxychloride and sulfur (CuS) or fosetyl-aluminum and penconazole (Sys) or Blad. Different colors represent different intervals of relative abundance (≤1; 1–5; 5–10; 10–20; >20). n = 5 for each combination inoculum/treatment.

(*) 50% or more of the biological replicates were successfully colonized by the inoculated fungus