Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov;29(11):1860–1877. doi: 10.1101/gr.234435.118

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Comparison of PhISCS with SiFit based on the (normalized) Robinson-Foulds distance. (A) Results for the case where ISA violations are allowed in PhISCS (SiFit, by default accounts for possible ISA violations), but only SCS data is used as the input. (B) Results for the case where ISA violations are allowed in PhISCS and both single-cell and bulk data (with coverage 10,000×) used as its input (SiFit does not support the use of bulk data). In all simulations, 100 single cells were sampled from 10 subclones harboring a total of 40 mutations. Only one bulk sample was used in B, potentially limiting the relative advantage of PhISCS by its use of bulk data. Nevertheless, the normalized RF distance between PhISCS inferred tree and the ground truth is reduced by the use of bulk data in all settings. (Note that “ISA” on the x-axes denotes the number of simulated ISA violating mutations.)