Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 6;181(3):1239–1256. doi: 10.1104/pp.19.00458

Figure 9.

Figure 9.

Substitutions of the WER Asp-105 residue alter root epidermal cell-type pattern. A, Schematic drawings illustrate WER::WER transgenes with different residue substitutions at position 105. B, Expression of the GL2::GUS transcriptional reporter in the wer-1 mutant and wer-1 mutants bearing different WER::WER transgenes. For each transgene, representative roots from three independent single-insertion lines are shown. Stars indicate H-position cell files. Bar = 50 μm. C, Expression of the CPC::GUS reporter in the wer-1 mutant and wer-1 mutants bearing different WER::WER transgenes. For each transgene, representative roots from three independent single-insertion lines are shown. Stars indicate H-position cell files. Bar = 50 μm. D, Quantifications of root epidermis specification in the wer-1 mutants bearing different WER::WER transgenes. Error bars represent sd from three replicates. Two-way ANOVA was used to determine the differences among different transgenic lines using the #1 line of the WER::WER transgene as the control. All transgenic lines showing significant differences in H and/or N positions from the control are marked: ***, P < 0.001; **, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05.