Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 7;2019(11):CD013145. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013145.pub2

for the main comparison.

Human milk‐derived multi‐nutrient fortifier compared with bovine milk‐derived multi‐nutrient fortifier for short‐term outcomes in preterm neonates
Patient or population: Preterm neonates (< 37 0/7 weeks' gestation) fed exclusively with breast milk
Settings: Neonatal Intensive Care Unit/healthcare setting
Intervention: Human milk‐derived multi‐nutrient fortifier
Comparison: Bovine milk‐derived multi‐nutrient fortifier
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) No of Participants
 (studies) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Risk with bovine milk‐derived multi‐nutrient fortifier Risk with human milk‐derived multi‐nutrient fortifier
Necrotizing enterocolitis Study population RR 0.95, (0.20 to 4.54) 125
 (1) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 lowa,b  
49.2 per 1000 46.9 per 1000 RD ‐0.00, 95% CI ‐0.08 to 0.07
Death Study population (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.17 to 3.06) 121
(1)
⊕⊕⊝⊝
 lowa,b  
65.6 per 1000 46.9 per 1000 (RD ‐0.02, 95% CI ‐0.10 to 0.06)
Weight (change during intervention)
(mean ± SD)
1303 ± 610g 1124 ± 534g (MD ‐179.00, 95% CI ‐386.38 to 28.38) 118
 (1) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 lowa,b  
Length (change during intervention)
(mean ± SD)
8.1 ± 4 cm 7.3 ± 4 cm (MD ‐0.80, 95% CI ‐2.25 to 0.65) 118
 (1) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 lowa,b  
Head circumference (change during intervention)
(mean ± SD)
6.8 ± 2.5 cm 6.2 ± 2.6 (MD ‐0.60, 95% CI ‐1.52 to 0.32) 118
 (1) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 lowa,b  
Feeding interruption requiring parenteral nutrition Study population (RR 2.86, 95% CI 0.31 to 26.75) 125
(1)
⊕⊕⊝⊝
 lowa,b  
16.4 per 1000 46.9 per 1000 (RD ‐0.02, 95% CI ‐0.10 to 0.06)
Late‐onset sepsis Study population (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.21) 125
(1)
⊕⊕⊝⊝
 lowa,b  
229.5 per 1000 125 per 1000 (RD ‐0.10, 95% CI ‐0.24 to 0.03)
*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
 CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk Ratio; RD: Risk Difference; MD: Mean Difference.
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
 High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
 Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
 Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
 Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

aImprecision as suggested by wide 95% confidence intervals

bInclusion of a single eligible study