TABLE 3.
Reasons for discordance | Patient |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 9 | 11 | 12 | 15 | 20 | |
Decrease in SPD of target lesions (< 50% vs. ≥ 50%) | † | ‡ | † | ‡ | † | ‡ | ‡ | ‡ | ‡ | ‡ |
Assessment of target lesion regression to normal | ‡ | † | ‡ | ‡ | ‡ | ‡ | † | † | † | - |
Assessment of spleen size regression to normal | ‡ | ‡ | ‡ | † | ‡ | ‡ | ‡ | ‡ | ‡ | ‡ |
Identification and reassessment of non-target disease | ‡ | ‡ | ‡ | ‡ | ‡ | ‡ | † | ‡ | ‡ | ‡ |
Identification of new lesions attributable to lymphoma | ‡ | ‡ | ‡ | ‡ | † | † | ‡ | ‡ | ‡ | † |
‘reason for discordance’ was present in that specific patient;
‘reason for discordance’ was absent in that specific patient.
SPD, sum of the product of the diameters; vs., versus.