Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct;9(5):481–491. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2019.09.07

Table 3. Stratified analysis of the diagnostic performance of 50% diameter stenosis by 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography for predicting fractional flow reserve ≤0.80 according to different lesion locations.

Index LAD LCx RCA P value
2D-QCA 50% DS
   Accuracy 61.8 (56.7–66.9) 66.4 (58.2–74.6) 70.8 (63.7–77.9) 0.13
   Sensitivity 39.6 (32.0–47.7) 75.0 (55.1–89.3) 58.3 (40.8–74.5) <0.001
   Specificity 79.9 (73.6–85.3) 64.1 (54.0–73.3) 74.7 (65.8–81.8) 0.01
3D-QCA 50% DS
   Accuracy 74.5 (70.0–79.1) 69.4 (61.5–77.5) 76.4 (69.8–83.0) 0.38
   Sensitivity 61.6 (53.6–69.2) 85.7 (67.3–96.0) 88.9 (73.9–96.9) 0.004
   Specificity 85.1 (79.2–89.8) 65.0 (55.0–74.2) 72.8 (64.1–80.4) <0.001

Values are n% (95% CI). Comparisons for accuracy, sensitivity and specificity among lesion groups of LAD, LCx and RCA were performed by chi-squared test. 2D-QCA, 2-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography; 3D-QCA, 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography; DS%, percent diameter stenosis; LAD, left anterior descending artery; LCx, left circumflex; RCA, right coronary artery.