Table 4.
Time-point for the assessment | Patients with MetS (n = 10) | p-value | Patients without MetS (n = 20) | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Total body fat percentage | ||||
At hospitalization | 46.5 [36; 53.6] | 0.944 | 31.2 [22.6; 30.0] | 0.005* |
After a 6-week treatment | 45.5 [35.9; 53.7] | 35.1 [25.4; 44.1] | ||
Visceral fat level | ||||
At hospitalization | 13 [9; 18] | 0.963 | 7 [4; 8] | 0.034* |
After a 6-week treatment | 13 [10; 17] | 8 [5; 9] | ||
Total fat fold | ||||
At hospitalization, mm | 119 [102; 146] | 0.341 | 84 [68; 116] | <0.001* |
After a 6-week treatment, mm | 124 [104; 146] | 85 [70; 118] | ||
Waist circumference | ||||
At hospitalization, cm | 114 [103; 125] | 0.105 | 87 [80; 95] | 0.020* |
After a 6-week treatment, cm | 115 [105; 125] | 88 [80; 95] | ||
Body weight | ||||
At hospitalization, kg | 103.1 [95.0; 119.1] | 0.306 | 73.7 [62.3; 87.9] | 0.029* |
After a 6-week treatment, kg | 103.3 [96.4; 117.6] | 74.2 [64; 89.5] | ||
Body mass index | ||||
At hospitalization | 36.1 [34.5; 37.8] | 0.889 | 25.0 [22.6; 30.0] | 0.023* |
After a 6-week treatment | 36.0 [34.4; 37.8] | 26.7 [23.6; 34.1] |
*p < 0.05—statistically significant difference. Comparisons between groups were performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.