Table 4.
Intervention a | WT | Mutant strains |
|||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
k = 2 |
k = 3 |
k = 4 |
|||||||||||||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | |||
↑ DGAT_rm | P (Rt) | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||
↑ ACCOAC_c | P (Rt) | X | |||||||||||||||
↑ ACOATA_c | P (O) | X | X | X | |||||||||||||
↑ ACOADS180_rm | P (Rt) | X | X | X | X | ||||||||||||
↑ ME2_c | C (Rt) | X | X | ||||||||||||||
↑ G6PDH2i_c | C | X | X | X | |||||||||||||
↑ GLYCDy_c | C | X | X | X | |||||||||||||
↓ FECOOR_m | R | X | |||||||||||||||
↓ ACONTa_m | R | X | |||||||||||||||
↓ AKGDa_m | R | X | |||||||||||||||
Δ beta-Oxidation b | D (O) | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||||
Δ Lipid degradation c | D (O) | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
TAG production flux (mmol/gDW/hr) | 0.185 | 0.567 | 0.570 | 0.569 | 0.569 | 0.568 | 0.572 | 0.572 | 0.565 | 0.565 | 0.566 | 0.569 | 0.569 | 0.568 | 0.568 | 0.567 |
Reaction abbreviations are listed in the table and annotated in the text. Reactions are described in Supplementary Materials 1. These interventions are classified into types of strategies: P – “push-pull”, C – cofactor regeneration, R – respiratory disruption, D – degradation knockout. Successful implementations in R. toruloides (Rt) (Zhang et al., 2016b, 2016a) or other oleaginous yeast (O) (Blazeck et al., 2014; Tamano et al., 2013) are reported.
beta-Oxidation knockout was applied manually prior to finding FORCE set for strains #8-15 in order to block fatty acid degradation. The first step for beta-oxidation in peroxisome and mitochondria were knocked out, which are fatty acyl-CoA oxidase (encoded by POX1, rt4374, and rt4384) and dehydrogenase (encoded by rt5702, rt4202, and rt1644), respectively.
Lipid degradation knockout was applied to all designs to produce TAG, including TAG lipase (encoded by TGL2, TGL5, and ATG15) and monoacylglycerol lipase (YJU3).