Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 21;3(11):nzz116. doi: 10.1093/cdn/nzz116

TABLE 2.

Comparison of macronutrient results by infrared analyzer1

FiltMid (n = 25) FTMid1 (n = 24) FTMid2 (n = 25) Near (n = 24) P value
Crude protein, g/dL 1.29 ± 0.32 (0.90–2.00) 1.43 ± 0.28 (1.03–2.00) 1.42 ± 0.30 (1.01–2.04) 1.40 ± 0.26 (1.07–1.96) 0.3254
Fat, g/dL 3.34 ± 0.65 (1.85–4.65) 3.44 ± 0.58 (2.55–4.72) 3.46 ± 0.49 (2.71–4.60) 3.44 ± 0.55 (2.49–4.80) 0.8771
Carbohydrate, g/dL 7.78a ± 0.17 (7.40–8.10) 6.38b ± 0.22 (5.89–6.72) 5.88c ± 0.37 (5.06–6.55) 7.90a ± 0.16 (7.62–8.17) <0.0001
1

Values represent mean ± SD (range) unless otherwise indicated. Data were evaluated with ANOVA and Tukey's honest significant difference for multiple comparisons. Values in the same row with the same superscript are not significantly different. FiltMid (Miris HMA), FTMid1 (MilkoScan), FTMid2, (LactoScope), and Near (SpectraStar). FiltMid, filtered midinfrared; FTMid, Fourier-transformed full-spectra midinfrared; Near, near infrared.