Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 6;6(6):ENEURO.0220-19.2019. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0220-19.2019

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

In vivo photostimulation and photosilencing of transfected BA INs and PNs during extinction training. A, Schematic of approach to targeting BA INs and PNs in CCK-Cre single-transgenic mice with AAV5-Ef1a-DIO-hChR2(H134R)-EYFP-WRPE-pA or AAV5-Ef1a-DIO-eArch3.0-EYFP. B, Representative example of EYFP expression after virus transfection. C, Virus-transfected (EYFP-expressing) cells labeled with Cck mRNA, including example of cell labeled with Gad1 mRNA (white arrows, scale bar = 20 µm). D, Virus-transfected (EYFP-expressing) cells labeled with Cck mRNA, including example of cell labeled with Slc17a7 mRNA (white arrows, scale bar = 20 µm). E, Blue (ChR2 group) or green (eArch3.0 group) was shone during each CS presentation of extinction training. For fiber placement maps see Extended Data Figure 6-1. F, Photoexcitation in the ChR2 group during each CS presentation of extinction training increased freezing during training and light-free extinction retrieval the following day, relative to EYFP controls. Photosilencing in the eArch3.0 group during each CS presentation of extinction training reduced freezing on light-free extinction retrieval the following day, relative to EYFP controls; n = 12–27 per group; *p < 0.05, #p < 0.05 T0 versus T1 extinction training. Results of similar interventions on locomotion and anxiety level are presented in Extended Data Figure 6-2.