Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 24;28:101362. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2019.101362

Table 2.

Impact of 6 (T2) months of intervention on nuclear anomalies in buccal cells.

Intervention RT
RTS
CT
T1 T2 P T1 T2 P T1 T2 P
Subjects [number] 29 29 27 27 31 31
MN cells [per 1000 diff. cells] 1.25 ± 0.45 1.31 ± 0.62 0.673 1.24 ± 0.47 1.22 ± 0.51 0.840 1.12 ± 0.35 1.13 ± 0.65 0.878
MN total [per 1000 diff. cells] 1.35 ± 0.46 1.55 ± 0.63 0.071 1.41 ± 0.50 1.09 ± 1.85 0.119 1.18 ± 0.39 1.31 ± 0.69 0.250
Nuclear buds [per 1000 diff. cells] 1.22 ± 0.81 1.31 ± 0.75 0.797 1.20 ± 0.97 1.16 ± 0.68 0.563 1.03 ± 0.75 1.03 ± 0.76 0.982
Binucleated cells [per 1000 diff. cells] 26.1 ± 9.6 28.7 ± 9.5 0.066 24.9 ± 7.4 25.5 ± 9.3 0.828 22.7 ± 8.0 25.3 ± 7.8 0.052
Karyorrhectic cells [per 1000 cells] 22.9 ± 9.8 25.3 ± 9.1 0.105 24.1 ± 8.7 26.3 ± 7.5 0.071 22.5 ± 10.7 25.1 ± 11.0 0.072
Karyolytic cells [per 1000 cells] 59.8 ± 26.8 62.9 ± 27.2 0.385 55.4 ± 22.8 54.1 ± 21.1 0.691 66.5 ± 25.3 67.1 ± 24.6 0.717
Pyknotic cells [per 1000 cells] 1.38 ± 1.15 1.55 ± 1.06 0.373 0.89 ± 0.80 1.07 ± 0.73 0.330 1.45 ± 0.99 1.35 ± 0.84 0.528

Data are means ± SD; p-values were calculated using Wilcoxon-Test. Only data from the Vienna Active Ageing Study were used for the analyses.