Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 19;24:102023. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.102023

Fig. 5.

Fig 5

The distributions of the 100 most predictive connections. A: Connections are divided into three groups: ipsilesional intrahemispheric (L), interhemispheric (Inter), and contralesional intrahemispheric (R). (B): Connections are further divided into six groups based on the sign of the connection weight (+: positive; - negative). (C): The percentages of the cerebrocerebellar connections in each model. (D): The relatively predictive contributions of each predefined network based on anatomy. For each network, the weights of all nodes belonging to this network were summed.