Table 2.
The 25 most highly ranked indicators reported by those who participated in Delphi Rounds 1–4
| Indicators | Ranking | |
|---|---|---|
| Round 1–3 | Round 4 | |
| Acceptability | 1 | 4–11 |
| Adoption | 2 | 3 |
| Adaptability/adaptation | 3 | 25 |
| Barriers | 4 | 19–22 |
| Context | 5 | 4–11 |
| Implementation | 6 | 4–11 |
| Feasibility | 7 | 12–16 |
| Dose delivered (completeness) | 8 | 17–18 |
| Reach | 9 | 1 |
| Dose received (exposure) | 10 | 4–11 |
| Adherence | 11–15 | 12–16 |
| Appropriateness | 11–15 | 23–24 |
| Cost | 11–15 | 2 |
| Effectiveness | 11–15 | 4–11 |
| Fidelity | 11–15 | 4–11 |
| Culture | 16–20 | 12–16 |
| Dose (satisfaction) | 16–20 | 19–22 |
| Maintenance | 16–20 | 19–22 |
| Recruitment | 16–20 | 19–22 |
| Sustainability | 16–20 | 4–11 |
| Complexity | 21–25 | 23–24 |
| Dose | 21–25 | 12–16 |
| Efficacy (of interventions) | 21–25 | 12–16 |
| Innovation characteristics | 21–25 | 23–24 |
| Self-efficacy | 21–25 | 17–18 |