Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 20;64(1):93–106. doi: 10.3233/WOR-192972

Table 4.

The five most frequently (>25%) used observational risk-assessment tools (OBRATs) among Swedish ergonomists. Results based on the survey questions: ‘Have you used the observational tool in question?’ and ‘Why do you use the method?’ respectively. Number of respondents and percentages (%)

SWEA-AFS KIM I KIM II QEC VIDAR
Have you used this tool?
  Yes 70 (100) 36 (51) 25 (36) 19 (27) 19 (27)
  No 0 (0) 16 (23) 28 (40) 23 (33) 44 (63)
  Not familiar with the tool 0 (0) 18 (26) 17 (24) 28 (40) 7 (10)
If yes, why do you use this tool?
  Easy to use 53 (76) 26 (72) 15 (60) 10 (53) 4 (21)
  Easy to communicate to the client 45 (64) 21 (58) 16 (64) 10 (53) 7 (37)
  Quick 35 (50) 15 (42) 10 (40) 10 (53) 0 (0)
  Most suitable for my assignments 15 (21) 12 (33) 11 (44) 5 (26) 8 (42)
  Easy to interpret the results 18 (26) 16 (44) 11 (44) 9 (47) 6 (32)
  No technical equipment is required 36 (51) 10 (28) 6 (24) 6 (32) 0 (0)
  Easy to adapt 31 (44) 11 (31) 8 (32) 6 (32) 4 (21)
  The method that I know best 44 (63) 6 (17) 5 (20) 4 (21) 3 (16)

SWEA-AFS: Physical Ergonomics: Provisions of the Swedish Work Environment Authority [14, 15], KIM I: (Key Item Method – Pulling, Pushing [16]. KIM II: Key Item Method – Lifting, Holding, Carrying [16]. QEC: Quick Exposure Check [17]. VIDAR: Video- och databaserad arbetsanalys [a video- and computer-based method for ergonomic assessment] [18].