Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 27;6(21):1901787. doi: 10.1002/advs.201901787

Table 2.

The comparison of EXAFS Fitting results and the optimized model of CoCp/G and Co1/G samples

EXAFS fitting
Sample Shell C.N. R [Å] σ2 × 10 [Å2]
CoCp2 Co–C 10.0 2.04 2.6
CoCp/G Co–O 2.7 1.95 0.9
Co–C 4.8 2.10 1.7
Co1/G Co–O 2.7 1.04 1.4
Co–C 4.2 2.09 1.4
DFT
R N
CoCp/G Co–O 2.00 2
Co–C 2.05 6
Co1/G Co–O 1.90 2
Co–C 2.03 4

C.N., coordination number; R, bond length; σ2, the Debye–Waller factor. Errors in the fitting parameters are N ± 20%, R ± 0.02 Å, σ2 ± 20%. Reproduced with permission.42 Copyright 2018, Nature Publishing Group.