Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 16.
Published in final edited form as: Biogeosciences. 2019 Jan 16;16(1):117–134. doi: 10.5194/bg-16-117-2019

Table 2.

Previous and our new best estimates (in bold) of the latitudinal partitioning of land fluxes over four time periods. All values are in PgC yr−1. Values are indicated by the model mean±1 standard deviation or 1σ error uncertainties. Regarding the T3L2 period (Gurney et al., 2004), our new estimate for the 1992–1996 period comes from the intercept of the fit lines with the observations in Fig. 2b, and the uncertainties on these values come from the standard error on these metrics from the fits. Regarding the RECCAP period (Peylin et al., 2013), our new estimate for the 2001–2004 period is the average of the five new models from this study.

Time period Source Number of models NET land T+SET land
1992–1996 T3L2 12 −2.42±1.05 0.95±1.17
Stephens et al. (2007) 3 −1.52±0.53 −0.49±0.25
T3L2 (intercept) 12 1.70±0.59 0.15±0.66
2001–2004
RECCAP all models 11 −2.25±0.58 0.93±0.90
RECCAP Group 1 5 −1.85±0.25 0.34±0.27
This study 5 1.67±0.46 0.34±0.27
2009–2011
This study 10 2.24±0.29 0.38±0.31
2004–2014
This study 6 2.17±0.36 0.05±0.11