Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 8;6(21):1900667. doi: 10.1002/advs.201900667

Figure 2.

Figure 2

PER2 strengthens the cytotoxicity of oxaliplatin in human OSCC. a–c) Dose‐dependent growth inhibition in response to oxaliplatin (L‐OHP) treatment in PER2 overexpression or PER2‐knockdown CAL27, SCC15, and SCC25 cells (n = 5 independent experiments). Wild‐type cells were used as control. CDI was the coefficient of drug interaction. d,e) Cell apoptosis was evaluated by flow cytometry of CAL27/PER2 and CAL27/PER2‐knockdown (KD) cells stained with Annexin V and PI after treatment with oxaliplatin (0, 10, 20, or 30 µmol L−1, 48 h) (n = 3 independent experiments). f,g) Cell‐cycle phases were determined by flow cytometry of CAL27/PER2 and CAL27/PER2‐KD cells after treatment with oxaliplatin (0, 10, or 20 µmol L−1, 48 h) (n = 3 independent experiments). h) Western blot and densitometric quantification of the indicated proteins in CAL27/PER2 and CAL27/PER2‐KD cells treated with 0, 10, 20, or 30 µmol L−1 oxaliplatin (n = 3 independent experiments). GAPDH was used as the loading control. i,j) Representative images of xenografts formed after oxaliplatin treatment. CAL27/PER2 and CAL27/PER2‐KD cells were subcutaneously injected into mice. Mock was used as the control. g,h) Two weeks after cell inoculation, mice were treated with 0, 5, 10, or 20 mg kg−1 oxaliplatin (twice a week) for four weeks at ZT4 or ZT16. k,l) Tumor weights and volumes at the endpoint of mice (n = 3 animals per group). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 (compared with wild type or mock). ANOVA was used. Data represent the mean ± SD.