Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 28;23(4):389–394. doi: 10.1007/s10006-019-00802-0

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical features of patients with epidermolysis bullosa rehabilitated with dental implants described in the literature

Variables
Patients (n) 28
 Male (%)/female (%)a 8 (29.6)/19 (70.4)
 Age (years), mean ± SD (min–max) 34.7 ± 12.1 (13–56)
Implants (n) 161
 Male (%)/female (%)a 57 (36.5)/99 (63.5)
 Implants per patient, mean ± SD (min–max) 5.8 ± 2.8 (2–11)
 Maxilla (%)/mandible (%) 83 (51.6)/78 (48.4)
 Failure/total (%)b 2/156 (1.3)c
 Healing time maxilla, mean ± SD (min–max) 5.7 ± 0.6 (4–6)
 Healing time mandible, mean ± SD (min–max) 3.6 ± 1.3 (0–6)
 Use of osteotome for placement in maxilla (%) 56/72 (77.8)d
 Placement under local (%)/general anesthesia (%) 125 (82.8)/26 (17.2)e
 Augmentation procedures/total (%) 24/161 (14.9)
Position (%)
 Incisor 60 (39.7)
 Canine 41 (27.2)
 Premolar 49 (32.4)
 Molar 1 (0.7)
 Not available 10
Prosthetic rehabilitation (%)
 Fixed partial 4 (14.3)
 Full-arch 17 (60.7)
 Overdenture 7 (25.0)
 Failure 0/28 (0)
Follow-up timef (months), mean ± SD (min–max) 39.2 ± 24.5 (6–111; n = 151)

SD, standard deviation

aSex was not informed for 1 patient (5 implants)

bThere was no information on survival for 1 patient (5 implants)

cBoth implant failures occurred before or at the abutment connection

dInformation not available for 11 maxillary implants

eInformation not available for 2 patients (10 implants)

fThere was no precise information on follow-up time for 2 patients (10 implants)