Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 8;32(6):899–918. doi: 10.1007/s10278-019-00196-1

Table 8.

Comparison of results

Datasets Method Accuracy Sensitivity Specificity
ABIDE I Nielsen et al. [15] 0.6 0.62 0.58
Ghiassian et al. [20] 0.6502
Sen [21] 0.6139 0.5781 0.6475
Our proposed method Adam 0.691 0.641 0.737
Adamax 0.7273 0.712 0.7348
ABIDE II Adam 0.6765 0.570 0.783
Adamax 0.7 0.582 0.804
Combination of ABIDE I and ABIDE II Adam 0.7045 0.679 0.7421
Adamax 0.7 0.59 0.798