Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Med Phys. 2019 Oct 8;46(11):4898–4906. doi: 10.1002/mp.13815

Table I:

TBR and wall thickness measured in NMC, MC and REF images for all phantom and human subject studies. These results were the mean values calculated based on the ROIs and profiles described in Fig. 1.

Study TBR Thickness (mm)
MC REF NMC MC REF NMC
Phantom fast 4.8 4.71 2.12 9.52 9.54 N/A*
Phantom slow 2.53 4.57 1.76 10.86 9.42 14.32
Subject 1 3.66 3.78 1.71 15.1 15.28 18.14
Subject 2 3.1 3.19 2.15 13.98 13.46 15.74
Subject 3 5.28 5.47 4.95 19.7 18.82 23.72
*

Unable to be quantified due to the ghost artifacts caused by motion in the image (left-bottom in Fig.3).

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure