Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2019 Jul 6;4(11):948–955. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.06.012

Table 1.

Binding potentials and ANOVA results for individual Regions of Interest

Region of Interest 1.Binding
Potentiala
2.MAOA*flx
p valueb
3.low-MAOA
flx effect
p valuec
4.low-MAOA
flx
effect sized
CORTEX
Dorsal Frontal Cortex 0.19 0.0032 0.0048 3.23
Enterorhinal/Piriform Cortex 0.21 0.3461 0.6822 ns
Posterior Cingulate/Precuneus 0.21 0.0101 0.0107 2.51
Visual Cortex 0.22 0.0618 0.0594 ns
Parietal Cortex 0.24 0.0101 0.0091 2.32
Orbital Frontal Cortex 0.24 0.0101 0.0107 3.64
Cingulate Cortex 0.26 0.0016 0.0032 3.65
Temporal Cortex 0.29 0.0142 0.0294 2.51
SUBCORTEX
Hippocampus 0.31 0.2430 0.2763 ns
Caudate Nucleus 0.46 0.0101 0.0107 2.62
Amygdala 0.60 0.3185 0.2785 ns
Insular Cortex 0.66 0.0130 0.0149 2.36
Hindbrain/Ventral Brainstem 0.72 0.1093 0.1781 ns
Putamen 0.74 0.0236 0.0594 ns
Thalamus 0.92 0.0716 0.0644 ns
Midbrain/Dorsal Brainstem 1.26 0.0957 0.0925 ns
a

ROIs were averaged on left and right side of brain; the mean of left and right averages was then computed

b

Interaction term from 2-way ANOVA, least squares model, FDR corrected

c

Pairwise comparison of fluoxetine and control within the low-MAOA subgroup; FDR correction

d

Cohen’s D effect size for fluoxetine effect within the low-MAOA subgroup; ns=not significant (p value ≤0.01 for significance)