Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 20;58(8):3135–3146. doi: 10.1007/s00394-018-1858-z

Table 4.

Continuous primary and secondary outcome variables at baseline and final follow-up at study end (12 weeks) in study participants with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels < 50 nmol/l at baseline and with available values at both study visits

Baseline visit Study end Treatment effect p value
Median IQR Median IQR Between-group differences with 95% CI
Endocrine characteristics
Total testosterone (nmol/l)
 Vitamin D (n = 19) 12.0 10.6–16.5 12.7 11.7–15.9 − 0.472 − 3.18 to 2.23 0.725
 Placebo (n = 20) 12.3 9.6–16.1 15.1 10.4–19.6
Free testosterone (ng/ml)
 Vitamin D (n = 17) 0.071 0.058–0.088 0.083 0.067–0.106 0.05 − 0.11 to 0.02 0.545
 Placebo (n = 18) 0.076 0.053–0.093 0.087 0.063–0.097
SHBG (nmol/l)
 Vitamin D (n = 17) 27.1 16.2–44.4 26.9 15.4–38.1 − 1.7 − 8.8 to − 1.7 0.005
 Placebo (n = 19) 28.0 20.1–42.0 37.0 21.9–46.7
Free androgen index
 Vitamin D (n = 17) 39.1 29.3–63.6 48.4 41.1–63.0 7.5 − 4.3 to 19.3 0.205
 Placebo (n = 19) 37.9 28.8–66.0 40.8 28.1–54.5
Estradiol (ng/ml)
 Vitamin D (n = 17) 34.2 26.9–53.4 37.1 27.6–54.8 3.2 − 7.0 to 13.3 0.532
 Placebo (n = 19) 35.4 24.4–41.7 34.4 28.1–46.1
FSH (mU/ml)
 Vitamin D (n = 17) 5.0 3.3–6.8 4.8 4.2–6.6 0.50 − 1.11 to 2.12 0.531
 Placebo (n = 19) 3.5 2.7–7.7 4.6 2.5–8.2
LH (mU/ml)
 Vitamin D (n = 17) 3.4 2.6–4.6 4.4 2.3–5.6 1.3 − 0.52 to 3.05 0.160
 Placebo (n = 19) 3.3 2.3–5.6 3.7 3.1–6.4
Metabolic characteristics
Homeostatic model assessment—insulin resistance
 Vitamin D (n = 16) 3.1 1.9–5.9 2.6 1.4–4.1 0.0 − 2.2 to 2.2 0.999
 Placebo (n = 17) 3.2 2.2–5.3 3.0 1.1–5.3
Homeostatic model assessment-β
 Vitamin D (n = 16) 131.4 85.0–251.6 158.7 99.9–227.1 9.2 − 83.0 to 101.5 0.893
 Placebo (n = 17) 196.3 137.3–255.0 146.2 59.0–323.8
MATSUDA-index
 Vitamin D (n = 14) 3.6 2.1–5.3 3.3 2.1–6.7 − 1.0 − 3.6 to 1.7 0.449
 Placebo (n = 17) 4.1 1.9–5.6 4.3 2.1–8.1
Quantitative insulin sensitivity check index
 Vitamin D (n = 16) 0.32 0.30–0.35 0.33 0.31–0.36 − 0.02 − 0.07 to 0.02 0.258
 Placebo (n = 17) 0.32 0.30–0.34 0.32 0.30–0.38
Area under the curve glucose
 Vitamin D (n = 17) 261.3 220.5–312.3 269.3 226.0–277.3 − 6.3 − 36.2 to 48.8 0.766
 Placebo (n = 17) 262.0 222.0–287.3 265.8 239.5–297.0
Area under the curve insulin
 Vitamin D (n = 16) 125.2 89.4–222.4 172.2 95.3–250.7 27.9 − 54.5 to 110.4 0.494
 Placebo (n = 17) 136.0 23.5–210.5 120.8 78.5–197.3
Lipids
Total cholesterol (mg/dl)
 Vitamin D (n = 16) 202 166–233 190 175–219 − 0.33 − 17 to 16 0.969
 Placebo (n = 19) 216 196–235 198 174–238
High-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (mg/dl)
 Vitamin D (n = 16) 48 42–61 43 39–53 − 4.1 − 9.9 to 1.7 0.163
 Placebo (n = 19) 50 41–61 53 40–64
Low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (mg/dl)
 Vitamin D (n = 15) 129 101–144 119 91–136 − 0.37 − 15 to 14 0.960
 Placebo (n = 18) 131 106–161 117 96–153
Triglycerides (mg/dl)
 Vitamin D (n = 16) 129 99–174 114 83–150 18.6 − 37 to 74 0.499
 Placebo (n = 19) 139 63–181 100 64–159
Body composition
Fat mass (kg)
 Vitamin D (n = 17) 31.6 25.9–39.9 31.9 26.7–35.4 0.1 − 1.8 to 2.0 0.911
 Placebo (n = 19) 31.3 23.9–39.9 28.9 23.6–37.4
Lean mass (kg)
 Vitamin D (n = 17) 61.7 51.4–65.6 60.6 53.6–65.3 0.13 − 0.9 to 1.1 0.786
 Placebo (n = 19) 58.0 56.4–62.6 57.8 56.8–63.0

Data are shown as medians and interquartile range. Treatment effects with 95% confidence interval and p values were calculated by ANCOVA for group differences at follow-up with adjustment for baseline values