Table 3.

Acceptability of Intervention, % participants answering in the affirmative as a function of pain group

	Acute Pain n = 29	Chronic Pain n = 49	No Pain n = 41	p
The educational intervention was helpful.	90	96	93	.56
The educational intervention taught me information that I did not know before.	83	88	90	.65
The educational intervention was easy to understand.	79	100	95	< .01
The educational intervention was fun.	41	63	56	.16
The educational intervention took too long.	21	12	22	.43
The educational intervention was interesting.	76	92	81	.13
I would recommend this educational intervention to someone else.	66	90	81	.03
I believe that more people should receive this educational intervention.	73	92	88	.05
I do NOT think the educational intervention was useful.	10	2	5	.27
The educational intervention was confusing.	7	4	5	.86
The educational intervention will help prevent you from overdosing.	100	100	100	-
The educational intervention will change the way you help other people who are overdosing.	100	100	100	-
I would recommend this intervention to a family member or friend.	100	100	100	-

Note: p-values correspond to chi-squared tests that compared the proportion of affirmative responses to each statement across Pain Group. Intervention and Intervention X Pain Group effects did not have a significant impact on acceptability scores. Results were collapsed across Presentation and Presentation + Mastery conditions because no significant differences were observed between those groups.