Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 May 28;7(8):2653–2660.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.05.029

Table 3.

Serum lead and current wheeze in study participants1

Serum lead (μg/L)
Exposure Odds ratio (95% confidence interval)
All participants (n = 13,888)
  Quartile 1 (<0.83 μg/L) 1.00
  Quartile 2 (0.83 – 1.27 μg/L) 0.98 (0.81, 1.19)
  Quartile 3 (1.27 – 2.00 μg/L) 0.96 (0.78, 1.18)
  Quartile 4 (≥2.00 μg/L) 1.15 (0.91, 1.45)
P for linear trend = 0.34
Never/former smokers (n = 10,742)
  Quartile 1 (<0.78 μg/L) 1.0
  Quartile 2 (0.78 – 1.20 μg/L) 1.00 (0.81, 1.24)
  Quartile 3 (1.20 – 1.83 μg/L) 0.95 (0.76, 1.19)
  Quartile 4 (≥1.83 μg/L) 1.10 (0.82, 1.46)
P for linear trend = 0.63
Current smokers (n = 3,146)
  Quartile 1 (1.04 μg/L) 1.0
  Quartile 2 (1.04 – 1.60 μg/L) 0.94 (0.67, 1.31)
  Quartile 3 (1.60 – 2.48 μg/L) 0.91 (0.59, 1.41)
  Quartile 4 (≥ 2.48 μg/L) 1.24 (0.78, 1.96)
P for linear trend = 0.43
1

All models were adjusted for age, gender, race/ethnicity, annual household income, BMI, family history of asthma, serum cotinine, and occupational exposure to mineral dust or exhaust fumes. The model for all participants was additionally adjusted for smoking status.

2

* P< 0.05 and ** P< 0.01