Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Urology. 2019 Aug 26;133:72–77. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.08.020

Table 2. Micturition pressure-flow study parameters with placebo or lidocaine.

Intraurethral 4% lidocaine did not change voiding efficiency or other micturition pressure-flow study variables. EMG, electromyography; Pabd, abdominal pressure; Pdet@Qmax, detrusor pressure at maximum flow rate; PVR, post void residual. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation, median (25%, 75% quartile), or n (%). *Analyzed by Student’s t test, Mann-Whitney U test, or Fisher’s exact test where appropriate.

Variable Placebo
(n=9)
Lidocaine
(n=8)
P*
Voiding efficiency (%) 92 (75, 95) 93 (91, 94) 0.81
PVR (mL) 60 (37, 199.5) 51 (32, 72.25) 0.42
Pdet@Qmax (cmH2O) 44 ± 15 40 ± 15 0.64
Pabd recruitment during flow 1 (11) 1 (12.5) 1.00
Intermittent flow pattern 4 (44) 2 (25) 0.62
Elevated EMG activity 3 (33) 1 (12.5) 0.59