Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct;8(5):569–580. doi: 10.21037/gs.2019.09.09

Table 1. Study design and rates of locoregional recurrence (LRR).

Study Design BCS + lipofilling (n) BCS alone (n) LRR BCS + lipofilling (%) LRR BCS alone (%)
Biasio et al. RCS 37 88 0 n/a
Biazus et al. PCS 65 0 7.86 n/a
Brenelli et al. PCS 59 patients (75 cases) 0 5.1* n/a
Debald et al. RCS 17 0 0 n/a
Gale et al. RCC 35 64 5.7 3.1
Garcia et al. PCS 37 0 0 n/a
Kahn et al. PCS 32 39 0 0
Krastev et al. RCC 139 150 0.72 4.7
Mazur et al. PCC 7 28 3.7** 4.1**
Mestack et al. RCC 32 45 0 4.4
Perez-Cano et al. PCS 67 0 0 n/a
Petit, Botteri et al. RCC 125 250 1.0 4.0
Petit, Lohsiriwat et al. RCS 143 patients (170 cases) 0 0.8 n/a
Petit, Rietjens et al. RCC 59 118 0.18 0.3
Rietjens et al. PCS 77 0 0.01 n/a
Silva et al. RCS 63 0 3.2 n/a
Silva et al. PCC 58 124 1.7 2.4
Sorrentino et al. PCC 54 444 6.4** 5.0**
Stumpf et al. RCC 27 167 3.7 4.2

*, reported as % recurrence per patient enrolled; **, overall LRR, not stratified for only BCS (includes mastectomy). BCS, breast conservation surgery; RCS, retrospective case series; PCS, prospective case series; RCC, retrospective case control; PCC, prospective case control.