Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct;8(5):569–580. doi: 10.21037/gs.2019.09.09

Table 2. Studies included and criteria to conclude lipofilling is safe.

Study Interval between resection and lipofilling Time to follow-up after lipofilling Comparison group Subgroup analysis of ER/PR/HER-2 in cases of recurrence Matched for ER/PR/Her2 Adequate powering
Biasio et al. Immediate 36 months Institutional database Meets criteria ** Not quantified
Biazus et al. Immediate 40.8 months Not quantified
Brenelli et al. 76±30.9 months 34.4±15.3 months Meets criteria Not quantified
Debald et al. 71.6 months (7–291.3 months) 23 days Not quantified
Gale et al. 54 months 32 months Matched controls ER*** Not quantified
Garcia et al. Immediate 12 months Not quantified
Kahn et al. Immediate 36 months Institutional database ** Not quantified
Krastev et al. 51.6 months 60 months Matched controls Meets criteria **** Not quantified
Mazur et al. Minimum of 12 months 36 months Matched controls Not quantified
Mestack et al. 50 months 27 months Matched controls ER and PR***** Not quantified
Perez-Cano et al. Minimum of 12 months 12 months Not quantified
Petit, Botteri et al. 56 months (8–155 months) 26 months (1–128 months) Matched controls ER****** Not quantified
Petit, Lohsiriwat et al. 39.7 months (0–216 months)* 19.2 months Not quantified
Petit, Rietjens et al. 32% <1 year 38 months lipofilling Matched controls Meets criteria ER and PR****** Not quantified
22% 1–2 years 42 months control
10% 2–3 years
36% >3 years
Rietjens et al. 35.2 months 6 months Not quantified
Silva et al. 36 months (4–324 months) 31 months Meets criteria Not quantified
Silva et al. 48.3 (0–269 months) 40.4 months Matched controls Meets criteria ER*** Not quantified
Sorrentino et al. 24.2% <1 year 51.2 (±35 months) Matched controls Meets criteria Luminal A Not quantified
45.1% 1–2 years Luminal B
30.7% >3 years Triple negative
Stumpf et al. Immediate 34 months Institutional database Meets criteria ** Not quantified

*, did not distinguish interval for BCS group, study included both mastectomy and BCS; **, unmatched control, comparison group of BCS performed during the same time period at the same institution without comment on ER/PR/HER-2; ***, statistically significant difference in Her-2+ status between fat grafting and control groups without stratifying for type of surgery (BCS vs. mastectomy), PR and triple negative unmatched but equally represented without stratifying for type of surgery; ****, unmatched but equal representation of ER/PR/Her2 positive and Triple Negative disease in study arms in all surgical groups without stratifying for type of surgery; *****, no comment on HER-2 status or triple negative distribution between groups; ******, unmatched but equal representation of Her-2 and PR in study arms in all surgical groups without stratifying for type of surgery, no comment on representation of triple negative disease. BCS, breast conservation surgery.