Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 7;9(10):581. doi: 10.3390/biom9100581

Table 2.

Effect of Cd (0.4 mM), M1 (109 cells/mL), and M2 (109 cells/mL) and their combinations on Phenolic compounds.

Treatments Total Phenols
(Mean ± SD)
Total Flavonoids
(Mean ± SD)
Total Anthocyanins (Mean ± SD)
CN 15.25 ± 0.78 e 0.772 ± 0.041 e 2.453 ± 0.35 d
Cd 19.66 ± 0.70 d 1.009 ± 0.017 c 4.372 ± 0.27 b
M1 25.61 ± 0.65 c 0.861 ± 0.012 d 4.050 ± 0.20 bc
M1+Cd 30.64 ± 0.61 b 1.343 ± 0.019 b 6.542 ± 0.31 a
M2 21.69 ± 0.73 d 0.946 ± 0.044 c 5.084 ± 0.15 b
M2+Cd 36.02 ± 0.92 a 1.586 ± 0.025 a 7.154 ± 0.33 a
F-ratio(df 1,12) T 515.8 ** 1005.7 ** 279.6 **
F-ratio(df 2,12) D 445.9 ** 230.9 ** 153.7 **
F-ratio(df 2,12) T x D 84.66 * 67.47 ** 1.762
HSD 2.029 0.0830 0.751

(A) Total phenols (B) total flavonoids, and (C) total anthocyanins in 45-day-old L. esculentum under Cd metal stress. Data is presented as means of 3 replicates ± S.D (standard deviation) and HSD values. F ratio values, * indicates significance at p ≤ 0.05 and ** indicates significance at p ≤ 0.01). Different letters on the table indicate that mean values of treatments are significantly different at p < 0.5 according to Tukey’s multiple comparison test (CN—control, Cd—cadmium, M1—P. aeruginosa, M2—B. gladioli, T—treatment, D—Dose, H.S.D—honestly significant difference).